Amendment #184 to H4600

Blockchain Commission

Mrs. Lipper-Garabedian of Melrose moves to amend the bill by adding the following section:

SECTION XXXX.

SECTION 1. A special commission is hereby established for the purposes of making an investigation relative to blockchain technology to develop a master plan of recommendations for fostering the appropriate expansion of blockchain technology in the Commonwealth.

SECTION 2. As used in this act, “blockchain” shall have the following meaning: a mathematically secured, chronological and decentralized ledger or database.

SECTION 3. The commission shall consist of 25 members: the speaker of the house of representatives or a designee who shall serve as co-chair; the minority leader of the house of representatives or a designee; the president of the senate or a designee who shall serve as co-chair; the minority leader of the senate or a designee; four members of the house of representatives appointed by the speaker; four members of the senate appointed by the president; the attorney general or a designee; the chair of the cannabis control commission or a designee; the commissioner of the department of revenue or a designee; the secretary of the executive office of technology services and security or a designee; the secretary of public safety and security or a designee; three persons to be appointed by the state secretary; provided that, one shall represent an organization focused on consumer protection; and five persons to be appointed by the governor including one appointee from a financial technology company, one appointee of a company with a business model that uses blockchain technology for purposes other than digital assets and two appointees representing institutions of higher education in the commonwealth.

All appointments shall be made not later than 45 days after the effective date of this act. The chairpersons shall meet with the commission not later than 90 days after the effective date of this act.

SECTION 4. The commission shall be charged with examining the following:

(a) The feasibility, validity and admissibility as well as risks, including privacy risks, and benefits of using blockchain technology in state and local government and Massachusetts-based businesses; provided that, for the purposes of government use, the commission’s examination shall include but not be limited to consideration of government records and delivery of services; court proceedings; statewide registries including for firearms, marijuana and opiates and election nomination papers, voter records and election results; and provided further that, for the purposes of business use, the commission’s examination shall include but not be limited to consideration of the advisability of allowing corporate records to be maintained using blockchain technology, including any security requirements necessary to ensure their accuracy;

(b) The need for modifications to the definition of blockchain in this act and to general law to effect the appropriate deployment of blockchain technology;

(c) The impact of the proliferation of the cryptocurrency industry on state revenues and the need to restructure the commonwealth’s tax framework, including the advisability of taxing cryptocurrency transactions as part of the sales tax;

(d) The advisability of government agencies and relevant business enterprises, including but not limited to cannabis retail stores, accepting payment in cryptocurrency;

(e) The feasibility of regulating the energy consumption associated with cryptocurrency;

(f) The consumer protection activities necessary to provide safeguards and offer technological literacy to Massachusetts residents, including but not limited to the advisability of licensure requirements;

(g) The best practices for enabling blockchain technology to benefit the commonwealth, Massachusetts-based businesses, and Massachusetts residents, including an examination of historical barriers to entry and participation in emerging technologies and markets for individuals underrepresented in these industries and markets;

(h) The state agencies best equipped to provide oversight of blockchain technology and the cryptocurrency industry, including with respect to consumer protection; and

(i) Any other related topic which the commission may choose to examine in relation to blockchain technology.

The commission shall take input from a broad range of stakeholders with a diverse range of interests affected by state policies governing emerging technologies, privacy, business, finance, the courts, the legal community, and state and local government.

SECTION 5. Not later than one year after all appointments to the commission have been made, pursuant to section 3, the commission shall report to the general court the result of its investigation and its master plan of recommendations to foster a positive blockchain technology environment, together with drafts of legislation necessary to effect its recommendations, by filing the same with the clerk of the house of representatives and the clerk of the senate.

Additional co-sponsor(s) added to Amendment #184 to H4600

Blockchain Commission