Skip to Content
March 29, 2024 Rain | 38°F
The 193rd General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Bill H.1689 191st (2019 - 2020)

An Act relative to establishing a prevailing wage for security officers

By Ms. Tyler of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1689) of Chynah Tyler and others for legislation to establish a prevailing wage for security officers. Labor and Workforce Development.

Bill Information

Presenter:
Chynah Tyler

Petitioners

Name District/Address
Chynah Tyler 7th Suffolk
Bud L. Williams 11th Hampden
Peter Capano 11th Essex
Gerard J. Cassidy 9th Plymouth
Mike Connolly 26th Middlesex
Daniel R. Cullinane 12th Suffolk
Julian Cyr Cape and Islands
Marjorie C. Decker 25th Middlesex
Marcos A. Devers 16th Essex
Daniel M. Donahue 16th Worcester
James B. Eldridge Middlesex and Worcester
Nika C. Elugardo 15th Suffolk
Denise C. Garlick 13th Norfolk
Carlos González 10th Hampden
Tami L. Gouveia 14th Middlesex
Natalie M. Higgins 4th Worcester
Daniel J. Hunt 13th Suffolk
Kay Khan 11th Middlesex
David Henry Argosky LeBoeuf 17th Worcester
Jack Patrick Lewis 7th Middlesex
Adrian C. Madaro 1st Suffolk
Elizabeth A. Malia 11th Suffolk
Liz Miranda 5th Suffolk
Frank A. Moran 17th Essex
Denise Provost 27th Middlesex
Rebecca L. Rausch Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex
David M. Rogers 24th Middlesex
Daniel J. Ryan 2nd Suffolk
Lindsay N. Sabadosa 1st Hampshire
Jon Santiago 9th Suffolk
Alan Silvia 7th Bristol
Thomas M. Stanley 9th Middlesex
José F. Tosado 9th Hampden
Paul F. Tucker 7th Essex
Tommy Vitolo 15th Norfolk

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The General Court provides this information as a public service and while we endeavor to keep the data accurate and current to the best of our ability, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.