SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1527        FILED ON: 1/21/2011

SENATE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1450

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

James B. Eldridge

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act applying the sales tax to certain retail sales over the internet.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

James B. Eldridge

 

Carl M. Sciortino, Jr.

34th Middlesex

Geraldine M. Creedon

11th Plymouth

Patricia D. Jehlen

 

Cory Atkins

14th Middlesex

Carolyn C. Dykema

8th Middlesex

Jason M. Lewis

31st Middlesex

Daniel A. Wolf

 


SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1527        FILED ON: 1/21/2011

SENATE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1450

By Mr. Eldridge, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1450) of James B. Eldridge, Carl M. Sciortino, Jr., Geraldine M. Creedon, Patricia D. Jehlen and other members of the General Court for legislation to apply the sales tax to certain retail sales over the internet.  Revenue.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the Year Two Thousand Eleven

_______________

 

An Act applying the sales tax to certain retail sales over the internet.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

Section 1 of Chapter 64H, as so appearing, is hereby amended by inserting after the word “chapter” the following words:-- “Any person shall be presumed to be a vendor if said person enters into an agreement with a resident of the Commonwealth under which the resident, for a commission or other consideration, directly or indirectly refers potential customers, whether by a link on an internet website or otherwise, to the person, if the cumulative gross receipts from sales by the person to customers in the Commonwealth who are referred to the person by all residents with similar agreements with the person is in excess of 10,000 dollars during the preceding twelve months.  This presumption may be rebutted by proof that the resident with whom the person has an agreement did not engage in any solicitation in the Commonwealth on behalf of the person that would satisfy the nexus requirement of the United States constitution during the twelve month period in question.”