HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2976        FILED ON: 1/18/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1287

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Viriato Manuel deMacedo

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act relative to clarifying procedures for the custodial protection of a child requiring assistance.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Viriato Manuel deMacedo

1st Plymouth

1/18/2013

Stephen L. DiNatale

3rd Worcester

1/18/2013

Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr.

12th Hampden

1/18/2013

Michael J. Rodrigues

First Bristol and Plymouth

1/18/2013

John H. Rogers

12th Norfolk

1/18/2013

Thomas J. Calter

12th Plymouth

1/18/2013

Michael R. Knapik

Second Hampden and Hampshire

1/18/2013

Angelo L. D'Emilia

8th Plymouth

1/18/2013

Randy Hunt

5th Barnstable

1/18/2013

Michael F. Rush

Norfolk and Suffolk

1/18/2013

Denise C. Garlick

13th Norfolk

1/18/2013

Todd M. Smola

1st Hampden

1/18/2013

Donald H. Wong

9th Essex

1/18/2013

Cleon H. Turner

1st Barnstable

1/18/2013

Leonard Mirra

2nd Essex

1/18/2013

James M. Cantwell

4th Plymouth

1/18/2013

Anne M. Gobi

5th Worcester

1/18/2013

Bradford Hill

4th Essex

1/18/2013

Christine E. Canavan

10th Plymouth

1/18/2013

Nicholas A. Boldyga

3rd Hampden

1/18/2013

Elizabeth A. Poirier

14th Bristol

1/18/2013

Alice Hanlon Peisch

14th Norfolk

1/18/2013

Richard J. Ross

Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex

1/18/2013

Sarah K. Peake

4th Barnstable

1/18/2013

Kenneth I. Gordon

21st Middlesex

1/18/2013

Matthew A. Beaton

11th Worcester

1/18/2013

Geoff Diehl

7th Plymouth

1/18/2013

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

1/18/2013

John F. Keenan

Norfolk and Plymouth

1/18/2013

Theodore C. Speliotis

13th Essex

1/18/2013

Bruce E. Tarr

First Essex and Middlesex

1/18/2013

Bradley H. Jones, Jr.

20th Middlesex

1/18/2013

James R. Miceli

19th Middlesex

1/18/2013

Harold P. Naughton, Jr.

12th Worcester

1/18/2013

Patricia A. Haddad

5th Bristol

1/18/2013

Keiko M. Orrall

12th Bristol

1/18/2013

Paul K. Frost

7th Worcester

1/18/2013

Cheryl A. Coakley-Rivera

10th Hampden

1/18/2013

William C. Galvin

6th Norfolk

1/18/2013

Danielle W. Gregoire

4th Middlesex

1/18/2013

George N. Peterson, Jr.

9th Worcester

1/18/2013

Brian M. Ashe

2nd Hampden

1/18/2013

Thomas P. Conroy

13th Middlesex

1/18/2013


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2976        FILED ON: 1/18/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1287

By Mr. deMacedo of Plymouth, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1287) of Viriato Manuel deMacedo and others relative to clarifying procedures for the custodial protection by law enforcement and court officials of a child requiring assistance.  The Judiciary.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the Year Two Thousand Thirteen

_______________

 

An Act relative to clarifying procedures for the custodial protection of a child requiring assistance.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1.  Section 39H of Chapter 119 of the General Laws, as most recently amended by chapter 240 of the acts of 2012, is hereby amended by inserting in the first line of clause (ii) after the word “and” the word:- preferably.

SECTION 2.  Section 39H of Chapter 119 of the General Laws, as so appearing in the 2010 Official Edition, is hereby further amended by striking the sentence “A child in custodial protection may not be confined in shackles or similar restraints or in a court lockup facility in connection with any proceedings under sections 39E to 39I inclusive.” and inserting in place thereof :- The preferred response by law enforcement and court officials when a child is in custodial protection in connection with any proceedings under sections 39E to 39I inclusive is to avoid the use of shackles and court lockup facilities when practicable.