HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 578        FILED ON: 1/13/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1674

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Martin J. Walsh and John Hart, Jr.

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act to require national background checks.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Martin J. Walsh

13th Suffolk

 

John Hart, Jr.

First Suffolk

1/15/2013

Denise C. Garlick

13th Norfolk

1/29/2013

Josh S. Cutler

6th Plymouth

 

Paul McMurtry

11th Norfolk

 

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

 

Jerald A. Parisella

6th Essex

1/24/2013

Tom Sannicandro

7th Middlesex

 

David T. Vieira

3rd Barnstable

 

Jason M. Lewis

Fifth Middlesex

 

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

 

Dennis A. Rosa

4th Worcester

 

Louis L. Kafka

8th Norfolk

 

Mark J. Cusack

5th Norfolk

 

John H. Rogers

12th Norfolk

 

Ruth B. Balser

12th Middlesex

 

Stephen L. DiNatale

3rd Worcester

 

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex

 

Angelo L. D'Emilia

8th Plymouth

 

William Smitty Pignatelli

4th Berkshire

 

Christine E. Canavan

10th Plymouth

 

James J. Dwyer

30th Middlesex

 

Michael O. Moore

Second Worcester

 

Mary S. Keefe

15th Worcester

 

Robert F. Fennell

10th Essex

 

Katherine M. Clark

Fifth Middlesex

 

Paul R. Heroux

2nd Bristol

 

Thomas M. Stanley

9th Middlesex

 

James M. Murphy

4th Norfolk

 

Tackey Chan

2nd Norfolk

 

Bradford Hill

4th Essex

 

Ann-Margaret Ferrante

5th Essex

 

Elizabeth A. Malia

11th Suffolk

 

Michael R. Knapik

Second Hampden and Hampshire

 

Kimberly N. Ferguson

1st Worcester

 

William N. Brownsberger

Second Suffolk and Middlesex

 

William M. Straus

10th Bristol

 

Alice Hanlon Peisch

14th Norfolk

 

Carolyn C. Dykema

8th Middlesex

 

Kevin J. Murphy

18th Middlesex

 

Matthew A. Beaton

11th Worcester

 

John J. Binienda

17th Worcester

 

Richard J. Ross

Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex

 

Bradley H. Jones, Jr.

20th Middlesex

 

Donald Humason

 

 

James M. Cantwell

4th Plymouth

 

Barry R. Finegold

Second Essex and Middlesex

 

Thomas J. Calter

12th Plymouth

 

Aaron Vega

5th Hampden

 

Paul Brodeur

32nd Middlesex

 

Bruce E. Tarr

First Essex and Middlesex

 

James E. Timilty

Bristol and Norfolk

 

John J. Lawn, Jr.

10th Middlesex

 

Jonathan Hecht

29th Middlesex

 

Carl M. Sciortino, Jr.

34th Middlesex

 

Kenneth I. Gordon

21st Middlesex

 

James J. O'Day

14th Worcester

 

Sheila C. Harrington

1st Middlesex

 

Linda Dorcena Forry

12th Suffolk

 

Denise Andrews

2nd Franklin

 

Sonia Chang-Diaz

Second Suffolk

 

Theodore C. Speliotis

13th Essex

 

Thomas P. Conroy

13th Middlesex

 

Thomas A. Golden, Jr.

16th Middlesex

 


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 578        FILED ON: 1/13/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1674

By Representative Walsh of Boston and Senator Hart, a joint petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1674) of Martin J. Walsh, John A. Hart and others relative to national criminal offender record information checks for persons working with individuals served by the Department of Mental Retardation.  The Judiciary.

 

[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 523 OF 2011-2012.]

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the Year Two Thousand Thirteen

_______________

 

An Act to require national background checks.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Section 172 of chapter 6 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2008 Official Edition, is amended by inserting the following new section 172J as follows:-

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person seeking employment or a position as a regular volunteer or trainee to provide services for, or, on behalf of the Department of Developmental Services or its vendor agency programs where such employment or position involves potential unsupervised contact with individuals with an intellectual disability (or other individuals determined to be eligible clients of the Department of Developmental Services) shall be required to have a national criminal background check prior to assuming said employment or position. Said criminal background check will be determined by using the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division.

It shall be the responsibility of the Commonwealth to ensure that said criminal background checks are processed for review prior to such time that an individual seeking employment or a position as a volunteer or trainee assumes said employment or position.

Any person who willfully requests, obtains or seeks to obtain criminal offender record information or the equivalent from other jurisdictions under false pretenses, or who willfully communicates or seeks to communicate criminal offender record information or the equivalent from other jurisdictions to any agency or person except in accordance with the provisions of sections one hundred and sixty-eight to one hundred and seventy-five, inclusive, or any member, officer, employee or agency of the board or any participating agency, or any person connected with any authorized research program, who willfully falsifies criminal offender record information, or the equivalent from other jurisdictions, or any records relating thereto, shall be in violation of this provision.

The Criminal History Systems Board, the Disabled Persons Protection Commission, and the State Police shall collaborate and jointly oversee  the participation by all Department of Developmental Services providers in any interstate system for the exchange of criminal offender record information or the equivalent from other jurisdictions and shall be responsible to assure the consistency of such participation including redacting information so that criminal offender record information or the equivalent from other jurisdictions is limited to convictions and open cases, and, that juvenile records are not made available. Any provider of services to individuals pursuant to a contract with the Department that hires, retains or supervises an employee, volunteer or trainee whom the provider knows or should know, will potentially come into unsupervised contact with such individuals, and, because of a criminal conviction or pending criminal charge of a nature that would pose a unacceptable risk of physical harm to or financial exploitation of such individuals shall be in violation of this provision. The hiring authority shall use, when making a determination of unacceptable risk, the guidelines as provided by existing Department of Developmental Services regulations.

The Board shall afford an individual who may be wrongly associated with a record or whose record may contain errors, the opportunity to contest the accuracy of an out-of-state record. Each individual shall have the right to inspect, and if practicable, copy, criminal offender record information or the equivalent from other jurisdictions which refers to him. If an individual believes such information to be inaccurate or incomplete, the Criminal Systems History Board shall notify the state whose record is contested and assist the individual in following the process for correcting inaccuracies in that state, as well as notify the agency to whom the record was disseminated that the record is being contested and that no adverse action can be taken by that agency pending a resolution of the dispute. This matter should be resolved as soon as practicable but no later than 30 days after notification. Agencies at which criminal offender records or the equivalent from other jurisdictions are sought to be inspected shall prescribe reasonable hours and places of inspection, and shall impose such additional restrictions as may be approved by the board, as are reasonably necessary both to assure the record’s security and to verify the identities of those who seek to inspect them.