HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 578 FILED ON: 1/13/2013
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1674
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Martin J. Walsh and John Hart, Jr.
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act to require national background checks.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: | Date Added: |
Martin J. Walsh | 13th Suffolk |
|
John Hart, Jr. | First Suffolk | 1/15/2013 |
Denise C. Garlick | 13th Norfolk | 1/29/2013 |
Josh S. Cutler | 6th Plymouth |
|
Paul McMurtry | 11th Norfolk |
|
Sean Garballey | 23rd Middlesex |
|
Jerald A. Parisella | 6th Essex | 1/24/2013 |
Tom Sannicandro | 7th Middlesex |
|
David T. Vieira | 3rd Barnstable |
|
Jason M. Lewis | Fifth Middlesex |
|
David Paul Linsky | 5th Middlesex |
|
Dennis A. Rosa | 4th Worcester |
|
Louis L. Kafka | 8th Norfolk |
|
Mark J. Cusack | 5th Norfolk |
|
John H. Rogers | 12th Norfolk |
|
Ruth B. Balser | 12th Middlesex |
|
Stephen L. DiNatale | 3rd Worcester |
|
Kay Khan | 11th Middlesex |
|
Angelo L. D'Emilia | 8th Plymouth |
|
William Smitty Pignatelli | 4th Berkshire |
|
Christine E. Canavan | 10th Plymouth |
|
James J. Dwyer | 30th Middlesex |
|
Michael O. Moore | Second Worcester |
|
Mary S. Keefe | 15th Worcester |
|
Robert F. Fennell | 10th Essex |
|
Katherine M. Clark | Fifth Middlesex |
|
Paul R. Heroux | 2nd Bristol |
|
Thomas M. Stanley | 9th Middlesex |
|
James M. Murphy | 4th Norfolk |
|
Tackey Chan | 2nd Norfolk |
|
Bradford Hill | 4th Essex |
|
Ann-Margaret Ferrante | 5th Essex |
|
Elizabeth A. Malia | 11th Suffolk |
|
Michael R. Knapik | Second Hampden and Hampshire |
|
Kimberly N. Ferguson | 1st Worcester |
|
William N. Brownsberger | Second Suffolk and Middlesex |
|
William M. Straus | 10th Bristol |
|
Alice Hanlon Peisch | 14th Norfolk |
|
Carolyn C. Dykema | 8th Middlesex |
|
Kevin J. Murphy | 18th Middlesex |
|
Matthew A. Beaton | 11th Worcester |
|
John J. Binienda | 17th Worcester |
|
Richard J. Ross | Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex |
|
Bradley H. Jones, Jr. | 20th Middlesex |
|
Donald Humason |
|
|
James M. Cantwell | 4th Plymouth |
|
Barry R. Finegold | Second Essex and Middlesex |
|
Thomas J. Calter | 12th Plymouth |
|
Aaron Vega | 5th Hampden |
|
Paul Brodeur | 32nd Middlesex |
|
Bruce E. Tarr | First Essex and Middlesex |
|
James E. Timilty | Bristol and Norfolk |
|
John J. Lawn, Jr. | 10th Middlesex |
|
Jonathan Hecht | 29th Middlesex |
|
Carl M. Sciortino, Jr. | 34th Middlesex |
|
Kenneth I. Gordon | 21st Middlesex |
|
James J. O'Day | 14th Worcester |
|
Sheila C. Harrington | 1st Middlesex |
|
Linda Dorcena Forry | 12th Suffolk |
|
Denise Andrews | 2nd Franklin |
|
Sonia Chang-Diaz | Second Suffolk |
|
Theodore C. Speliotis | 13th Essex |
|
Thomas P. Conroy | 13th Middlesex |
|
Thomas A. Golden, Jr. | 16th Middlesex |
|
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 578 FILED ON: 1/13/2013
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1674
By Representative Walsh of Boston and Senator Hart, a joint petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1674) of Martin J. Walsh, John A. Hart and others relative to national criminal offender record information checks for persons working with individuals served by the Department of Mental Retardation. The Judiciary. |
[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 523 OF 2011-2012.]
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the Year Two Thousand Thirteen
_______________
An Act to require national background checks.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 172 of chapter 6 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2008 Official Edition, is amended by inserting the following new section 172J as follows:-
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person seeking employment or a position as a regular volunteer or trainee to provide services for, or, on behalf of the Department of Developmental Services or its vendor agency programs where such employment or position involves potential unsupervised contact with individuals with an intellectual disability (or other individuals determined to be eligible clients of the Department of Developmental Services) shall be required to have a national criminal background check prior to assuming said employment or position. Said criminal background check will be determined by using the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division.
It shall be the responsibility of the Commonwealth to ensure that said criminal background checks are processed for review prior to such time that an individual seeking employment or a position as a volunteer or trainee assumes said employment or position.
Any person who willfully requests, obtains or seeks to obtain criminal offender record information or the equivalent from other jurisdictions under false pretenses, or who willfully communicates or seeks to communicate criminal offender record information or the equivalent from other jurisdictions to any agency or person except in accordance with the provisions of sections one hundred and sixty-eight to one hundred and seventy-five, inclusive, or any member, officer, employee or agency of the board or any participating agency, or any person connected with any authorized research program, who willfully falsifies criminal offender record information, or the equivalent from other jurisdictions, or any records relating thereto, shall be in violation of this provision.
The Criminal History Systems Board, the Disabled Persons Protection Commission, and the State Police shall collaborate and jointly oversee the participation by all Department of Developmental Services providers in any interstate system for the exchange of criminal offender record information or the equivalent from other jurisdictions and shall be responsible to assure the consistency of such participation including redacting information so that criminal offender record information or the equivalent from other jurisdictions is limited to convictions and open cases, and, that juvenile records are not made available. Any provider of services to individuals pursuant to a contract with the Department that hires, retains or supervises an employee, volunteer or trainee whom the provider knows or should know, will potentially come into unsupervised contact with such individuals, and, because of a criminal conviction or pending criminal charge of a nature that would pose a unacceptable risk of physical harm to or financial exploitation of such individuals shall be in violation of this provision. The hiring authority shall use, when making a determination of unacceptable risk, the guidelines as provided by existing Department of Developmental Services regulations.
The Board shall afford an individual who may be wrongly associated with a record or whose record may contain errors, the opportunity to contest the accuracy of an out-of-state record. Each individual shall have the right to inspect, and if practicable, copy, criminal offender record information or the equivalent from other jurisdictions which refers to him. If an individual believes such information to be inaccurate or incomplete, the Criminal Systems History Board shall notify the state whose record is contested and assist the individual in following the process for correcting inaccuracies in that state, as well as notify the agency to whom the record was disseminated that the record is being contested and that no adverse action can be taken by that agency pending a resolution of the dispute. This matter should be resolved as soon as practicable but no later than 30 days after notification. Agencies at which criminal offender records or the equivalent from other jurisdictions are sought to be inspected shall prescribe reasonable hours and places of inspection, and shall impose such additional restrictions as may be approved by the board, as are reasonably necessary both to assure the record’s security and to verify the identities of those who seek to inspect them.