HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1689        FILED ON: 1/17/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 2952

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Stephen Kulik

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act relative to double poles.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Stephen Kulik

1st Franklin

1/17/2013

Denise Andrews

2nd Franklin

1/29/2013

Marjorie C. Decker

25th Middlesex

2/1/2013

Marcos A. Devers

16th Essex

2/1/2013

Eileen M. Donoghue

First Middlesex

1/31/2013

Anne M. Gobi

5th Worcester

1/24/2013

Kenneth I. Gordon

21st Middlesex

1/25/2013

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex

1/29/2013

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

1/28/2013

Sarah K. Peake

4th Barnstable

1/24/2013

Denise Provost

27th Middlesex

1/30/2013

Jeffrey N. Roy

10th Norfolk

1/30/2013

John W. Scibak

2nd Hampshire

1/30/2013

Cleon H. Turner

1st Barnstable

1/25/2013


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1689        FILED ON: 1/17/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 2952

By Mr. Kulik of Worthington, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2952) of Stephen Kulik and others relative to double utility poles.  Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

 

[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 1769 OF 2011-2012.]

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the Year Two Thousand Thirteen

_______________

 

An Act relative to double poles.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Section 34B of chapter 164 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2010 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the word “pole;” in line 5, the following:-

provided further, that a city or town may enforce this section by the enactment of a local ordinance or bylaw prohibiting double poles beyond the ninety days authorized by this section, violation of which may be punishable by a fine not to exceed a maximum of one thousand dollars per occurrence.