Resolved, Whereas, over two million tons of Massachusetts municipal solid waste are landfilled every year, both in and out of the Commonwealth; and
Whereas, there is no moratorium on landfills in the Commonwealth; and
Whereas, landfills are one of the largest sources of manmade methane (a Green House Gas (“GHG”) 25 times as potent as carbon dioxide over a 100 year time frame); and
Whereas, landfills have significant uncontrolled emissions, including over 150 Air Toxins in addition to methane; and
Whereas, increasingly, waste is being viewed as a resource and an opportunity for reducing GHG emissions; and
Whereas, both the European Union and the United States Environmental Protection Agency have developed comprehensive waste management hierarchies which give preference to recycling and energy recovery over waste disposal in landfills; and
Whereas, these waste management hierarchies provide a clear direction for integrated solid waste management: reduce, reuse, recycle, recover energy, and then landfill as a last resort; and
Whereas, this Resolution reflects the fact that waste reduction and reuse provide the most energy savings and GHG reduction and landfills generate the least energy (often acting as an energy sink) and the most GHG emissions; and
Whereas, not all management approaches for post recycled waste are equal; and
Whereas, it is impossible to consider recycling without understanding and planning for the environmentally responsible and sustainable management of the materials remaining after recycling; and
Whereas, planning for the waste remaining after recycling does not limit recycling, nor does it diminish the importance of recycling; and
Whereas, in fact, the European Union has achieved significant recycling rates concurrently with significant levels of energy recovery, at the expense of landfilling; and
Whereas, the current draft Solid Waste Master Plan is silent on the management of waste remaining after recycling; and
Whereas, this silence relies on landfills by default, which is the least desirable disposal option when considering GHG emissions and the lost energy and materials when waste is placed in a landfill; and
Whereas, the movement away from landfills is supported by the Nobel prize winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”), the World Economic Forum Davos Report, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCCC”), the European Environmental Agency, the Global Roundtable on Climate Change (GROCC) convened by Columbia University’s Earth Institute, and the U.S. Conference of Mayors; now, therefore;
BE IT RESOLVED by the General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts:
1. The Department of Environmental Protection is urged to institute a comprehensive waste management hierarchy to develop a full waste management plan for the commonwealth, meaning the commonwealth will have moved to a more progressive policy in managing the wastes remaining after recycling; and
2. Specifically, the Department of Environmental Protection should adopt the “reduce, reuse, recycle, recover energy, and then landfill as a last resort” hierarchy as had been adopted by the European Union and the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The General Court provides this information as a public service and while we endeavor to keep the data accurate and current to the best of our ability, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.