SENATE DOCKET, NO. 62        FILED ON: 1/10/2013

SENATE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 631

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

William N. Brownsberger

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act decriminalizing non-violent and verbal student misconduct.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

William N. Brownsberger

Second Suffolk and Middlesex

Ruth B. Balser

12th Middlesex

Patricia D. Jehlen

Second Middlesex

Karen E. Spilka

Second Middlesex and Norfolk

John F. Keenan

Norfolk and Plymouth

Gloria L. Fox

7th Suffolk

Gale D. Candaras

First Hampden and Hampshire


SENATE DOCKET, NO. 62        FILED ON: 1/10/2013

SENATE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 631

By Mr. Brownsberger, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 631) of William N. Brownsberger, Ruth B. Balser, Patricia D. Jehlen, Karen E. Spilka and other members of the General Court for legislation to decriminalize non-violent and verbal student misconduct.  The Judiciary.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the Year Two Thousand Thirteen

_______________

 

An Act decriminalizing non-violent and verbal student misconduct.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Chapter 272 of the General Laws is amended by striking out section 40, as appearing in the 2010 Official Edition, and inserting in place thereof the following section:-

Section 40. Whoever willfully interrupts or disturbs an assembly of people met for a lawful purpose shall be punished by a fine of not more than fifty dollars; provided, however, that an interruption or disturbance alleged to be created by a student in a school shall not be considered willful unless the student has received at least 2 prior written warnings in the current school year from the school principal arising from such conduct, and has received assistance in controlling such behavior reasonably calculated to cause it to cease. Assistance shall include, but is not limited to, a functional behavioral assessment that accounts for the circumstances tending to trigger disruptive behavior and that correlates with a behavioral intervention plan prescribing appropriate responses to behavior that may de-escalate disruptions. No student whose conduct would otherwise be considered willful shall be in violation of this section unless prescribed responses are utilized prior to any arrest. Whoever, within one year after being twice convicted of a violation of this section, again violates the provisions of this section shall be punished by imprisonment for one month, and the sentence imposing such imprisonment shall not be suspended.

SECTION 2.  Chapter 272 is hereby further amended by striking out subsection (b) of section 53, as appearing in the 2010 Official Edition, and inserting in place thereof the following subsection:-

(b) Disorderly persons and disturbers of the peace, for the first offense, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $150. On a second or subsequent offense, such person shall be punished by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for not more than 6 months, or by a fine of not more than $200, or by both such fine and imprisonment, provided, however, that a student shall not be convicted or adjudicated for a violation of this provision based on conduct in school or at school-related events except in accordance with section 272 of chapter 272.