HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1776        FILED ON: 1/15/2015

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1531

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Sarah K. Peake

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act to protect electronic privacy.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Sarah K. Peake

4th Barnstable

1/15/2015

Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr.

12th Hampden

1/20/2015

Chris Walsh

6th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Timothy R. Madden

Barnstable, Dukes and Nantucket

9/24/2019

Jay R. Kaufman

15th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Ann-Margaret Ferrante

5th Essex

9/24/2019

Carolyn C. Dykema

8th Middlesex

1/20/2015

Brian M. Ashe

2nd Hampden

9/24/2019

Michael J. Rodrigues

First Bristol and Plymouth

9/24/2019

Jason M. Lewis

Fifth Middlesex

9/24/2019

Marjorie C. Decker

25th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Tricia Farley-Bouvier

3rd Berkshire

1/21/2015

John W. Scibak

2nd Hampshire

9/24/2019

Tackey Chan

2nd Norfolk

9/24/2019

Louis L. Kafka

8th Norfolk

9/24/2019

Jonathan Hecht

29th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Jennifer E. Benson

37th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Dennis A. Rosa

4th Worcester

9/24/2019

Jose F. Tosado

9th Hampden

9/24/2019

Jonathan D. Zlotnik

2nd Worcester

9/24/2019

Kenneth I. Gordon

21st Middlesex

9/24/2019

Paul W. Mark

2nd Berkshire

9/24/2019

Bradley H. Jones, Jr.

20th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Josh S. Cutler

6th Plymouth

9/24/2019

Daniel J. Hunt

13th Suffolk

9/24/2019

Steven S. Howitt

4th Bristol

1/26/2015

Angelo M. Scaccia

14th Suffolk

9/24/2019

Peter V. Kocot

1st Hampshire

9/24/2019

Keiko M. Orrall

12th Bristol

9/24/2019

Ellen Story

3rd Hampshire

9/24/2019

Cory Atkins

14th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Jay D. Livingstone

8th Suffolk

9/24/2019

Timothy J. Toomey, Jr.

26th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Michael J. Finn

6th Hampden

9/24/2019

Ruth B. Balser

12th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Mary S. Keefe

15th Worcester

9/24/2019

Paul McMurtry

11th Norfolk

9/24/2019

Lori A. Ehrlich

8th Essex

9/24/2019

Leonard Mirra

2nd Essex

9/24/2019

Gailanne M. Cariddi

1st Berkshire

9/24/2019

James M. Cantwell

4th Plymouth

9/24/2019

David M. Rogers

24th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Thomas J. Calter

12th Plymouth

9/24/2019

James B. Eldridge

Middlesex and Worcester

9/24/2019

William M. Straus

10th Bristol

9/24/2019

Alice Hanlon Peisch

14th Norfolk

9/24/2019

James J. Lyons, Jr.

18th Essex

9/24/2019

Michael D. Brady

Second Plymouth and Bristol

9/24/2019

Diana DiZoglio

14th Essex

9/24/2019

Danielle W. Gregoire

4th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Joseph W. McGonagle, Jr.

28th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Kevin G. Honan

17th Suffolk

9/24/2019

Barbara A. L'Italien

Second Essex and Middlesex

9/24/2019

James J. O'Day

14th Worcester

9/24/2019

Tom Sannicandro

7th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Denise Provost

27th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Edward F. Coppinger

10th Suffolk

9/24/2019

Linda Dorcena Forry

First Suffolk

9/24/2019

Timothy R. Whelan

1st Barnstable

2/2/2015

Patricia A. Haddad

5th Bristol

9/24/2019

Daniel J. Ryan

2nd Suffolk

9/24/2019

Colleen M. Garry

36th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex

9/24/2019

Stephen Kulik

1st Franklin

9/24/2019

Bruce E. Tarr

First Essex and Middlesex

9/24/2019

Aaron Michlewitz

3rd Suffolk

9/24/2019

Byron Rushing

9th Suffolk

9/24/2019

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

9/24/2019

John F. Keenan

Norfolk and Plymouth

9/24/2019

Gloria L. Fox

7th Suffolk

9/24/2019

Randy Hunt

5th Barnstable

9/24/2019

Jeffrey N. Roy

10th Norfolk

9/24/2019

Aaron Vega

5th Hampden

9/24/2019

Joseph D. McKenna

18th Worcester

9/24/2019

Denise C. Garlick

13th Norfolk

9/24/2019

James Arciero

2nd Middlesex

9/24/2019

William Smitty Pignatelli

4th Berkshire

9/24/2019

Frank I. Smizik

15th Norfolk

9/24/2019

Leah Cole

12th Essex

9/24/2019

Kate Hogan

3rd Middlesex

9/24/2019

Brian R. Mannal

2nd Barnstable

9/24/2019

Anne M. Gobi

Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire and Middlesex

9/24/2019

Daniel M. Donahue

16th Worcester

9/24/2019

Kevin J. Kuros

8th Worcester

9/24/2019

Antonio F. D. Cabral

13th Bristol

9/24/2019

Steven Ultrino

33rd Middlesex

9/24/2019

Stephen L. DiNatale

3rd Worcester

9/24/2019

Benjamin Swan

11th Hampden

9/24/2019

Nicholas A. Boldyga

3rd Hampden

9/24/2019

Michael S. Day

31st Middlesex

9/24/2019

Brendan P. Crighton

11th Essex

9/24/2019

John J. Mahoney

13th Worcester

9/24/2019

Peter J. Durant

6th Worcester

9/24/2019

Elizabeth A. Malia

11th Suffolk

9/24/2019

Paul R. Heroux

2nd Bristol

9/24/2019

David K. Muradian, Jr.

9th Worcester

9/24/2019

Bradford R. Hill

4th Essex

9/24/2019

Claire D. Cronin

11th Plymouth

9/24/2019

F. Jay Barrows

1st Bristol

9/24/2019

Harold P. Naughton, Jr.

12th Worcester

9/24/2019


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1776        FILED ON: 1/15/2015

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1531

By Ms. Peake of Provincetown, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1531) of Sarah K. Peake and others for legislation to update penalties and protect electronic privacy.  The Judiciary.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Eighty-Ninth General Court
(2015-2016)

_______________

 

An Act to protect electronic privacy.

 

Whereas, The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purpose, which is to protect the privacy of personal electronic information, therefore it is hereby declared to be an emergency law, necessary for the immediate preservation of the public convenience.
 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Section 1B of chapter 276 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2010 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the definition of “electronic communication services” the following definition:-

“Electronic device”, any device that enables access to, or use of, an electronic communication service, remote computing service or location information service.

SECTION 2. Said section 1B of said chapter 276, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by inserting after the definition of “foreign corporation” the following definitions:-

“Location information”, any information concerning the location of an electronic device that, in whole or in part, is generated by or derived from the device or any of its applications.

“Location information service”, a global positioning service or other mapping, locational or directional information service.

SECTION 3. Said section 1B of said chapter 276 is hereby amended by striking out subsection (b) and inserting in place thereof the following:-

(b) Upon complaint on oath that the complainant believes (i) that particular identified records or information hereinafter described are in the actual or constructive custody of a Massachusetts or foreign corporation providing electronic communication services, remote computing services, or location information services, and (ii) that such records or information constitute evidence of or the means or instrumentalities of the commission of a specified criminal offense under the laws of the commonwealth, a justice of the superior court may, if satisfied that there is probable cause for such beliefs, issue a warrant identifying those records to be sought and authorizing the person making application for the warrant to properly serve the warrant upon the corporation and to take all other actions prescribed by this section:-

(1) records which could, alone or in combination, reveal the identity of a user of those services;

(2) records regarding the use of those services;

(3) records regarding the source or recipient of user communications;

(4) data stored by or on behalf of a user of those services;

(5) any content of communications transmitted by an electronic device or stored by those services; or

(6) location information. 

A government office or public official may obtain records or information described in clauses (4), (5), or (6) only with a valid warrant issued pursuant to this section. 

SECTION 4. Subsection (c) of said section 1B of said chapter 276, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out the language in lines 54 to 58, inclusive, and inserting in place thereof  the following:-

(c) The following provisions shall apply to any search warrant issued under this section and to any subpoena issued in the course of a criminal investigation or proceeding directed to a Massachusetts or foreign corporation that provides electronic communication services, remote computing services or location information services:

SECTION 5. Said subsection (c) of said section 1B of said chapter 276, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out, in lines 61, 69, 72, and 83, the word “foreign”.

SECTION 6.  Said section 1B of said chapter 276, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by adding the following:-

(f) Search warrants issued under this section shall designate the corporation or other entity in possession of the records or data sought and shall describe, with particularity, the record systems and information to be provided.  They shall be issued in the form and manner prescribed in sections 2A½ and 2B, in so far as they are applicable, and shall be directed to the government office or public official making application for the warrant, which shall serve the warrant upon the corporation or other entity.

(g) Not later than 7 days after information described in paragraphs (1) to (6), inclusive, of subsection (b) is obtained by a government office or public official pursuant to a warrant under this section, that office or official shall serve upon, or deliver by registered or first-class mail, electronic mail, or other means reasonably calculated to be effective as specified by the court issuing the warrant to the customer or subscriber a copy of the warrant, a copy of the application for the warrant and notice that informs the customer or subscriber of the following:

(1)the nature of the law enforcement inquiry with reasonable specificity;

(2)that information maintained for the customer or subscriber by the provider of an electronic communications service, remote computing service or location information service was requested by or supplied to that government office or public official, and a description of that information;

(3)the dates on which the request was made and on which the information was supplied;

(4)whether notification of the customer or subscriber was delayed under subsection (h); and

(5)which court made the certification or determination under which that delay was made, if applicable.

(h) A government office or public official may include in its application for a warrant a request for an order delaying the notification required under subsection (g) for a period not to exceed 90 days, and the court shall issue the order if it determines there is reason to believe that notification of the existence of the warrant may have an adverse result.  Upon expiration of any period of delay granted under this subsection, the government office or public official shall provide the customer or subscriber a copy of the warrant together with notice required under, and by the means described in, subsection (g). 

(i) A government office or public official may include in its application for a warrant a request for an order directing a corporation to which a warrant is directed not to notify any other person of the existence of the warrant for a period of not more than 90 days, and the court shall issue the order if the court determines that there is reason to believe that notification of the existence of the warrant will have an adverse result.

(j) The court may, upon application, grant 1 or more extensions of orders granted under subsections (h) and (i) for an additional 90 days if the court determines that there is reason to believe that notification of the existence of the warrant will have an adverse result.

(k) Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, a government office or public official may obtain information described in paragraphs (1) to (6), inclusive, of subsection (b):

(1)with the specific contemporaneous consent of the owner or user of the electronic communications device concerned;

(2)in order to respond to the user’s call for emergency services; or

(3)if it reasonably believes that an emergency involving immediate danger of death or serious physical injury to any person requires obtaining without delay information relating to the emergency; provided, however, that the request is narrowly tailored to address the emergency and subject to the following limitations:

(i)the request shall document the factual basis for believing that an emergency involving immediate danger of death or serious physical injury to a person requires obtaining without delay of the information relating to the emergency; and

(ii) not later than 48 hours after the government office obtains access to     records, it shall file with the appropriate court a signed, sworn statement of a supervisory official of a rank designated by the head of the office setting forth the grounds for the emergency access.

(l) On the second Friday of January of each calendar year, any judge issuing or denying a warrant under this section during the preceding calendar year shall report on each such warrant to the office of court management within the trial court:

(1)the fact that the warrant was applied for;

(2)the identity of the agency making the application;

(3)the offense specified in the warrant or application therefor;

(4)the nature of the facilities from which or the place where the information was to be obtained;

(5)the fact that the warrant was granted as applied for, was modified or was denied;

(6)the period of disclosures authorized by the warrant, and the number and duration of any extensions of the warrant; and

(7)any order directing delayed notification of the warrant’s existence.

In June of each year, beginning in 2016, the court administrator in the office of court management within the trial court shall transmit to the legislature a full and complete report concerning the number of applications for warrants authorizing or requiring the disclosure of information described in paragraphs (1) to (6), inclusive, of subsection (b) under this act. The reports shall include a summary and analysis of the data required to be filed with that office. The reports shall be filed with the offices of the clerk of the house and the senate and shall be public records.  The court administrator in the office of court management within the trial court shall issue guidance regarding the form of the reports. 

(m) Except in a judicial proceeding alleging a violation of this section, no information obtained in violation of this section and no information provided beyond the scope of the materials authorized to be obtained shall be admissible in any criminal, civil, administrative or other proceeding. 

SECTION 7.  Chapter 276 is hereby amended by inserting after section 2A the following section:-

Section 2A½. A warrant for records or data from a corporation providing electronic communication services, remote computing services or location information services shall be in substantially the following form:

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.

(COUNTY), ss.   (NAME) COURT.

To the Sheriffs of our several counties, or their deputies, any State Police Officer, or any Constable or Police Officer of any city or town, within our said Commonwealth.

Proof by affidavit having been made this day before (name of person authorized to issue warrant) by (names of person or persons whose affidavits have been taken) that there is probable cause for believing that certain records or data in the possession of (identify corporation) constitute evidence of or the means or instrumentalities of the commission of (specified criminal offense under the laws of the commonwealth).

We therefore command you to present this warrant to (identify corporation), which warrant shall operate as an order for immediate disclosure of the following records or data:

(description of records or data),

and if any such records or data are disclosed to bring it before (court having jurisdiction) at (name of court and location).

Dated at (city or town) this __________ day of __________, (insert year).

Clerk.

SECTION 8.  Section 2B of said chapter 276, as appearing in the 2010 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking clauses 3 and 4 of the model affidavit and inserting in place thereof the following:-

3. Based upon the foregoing reliable information (and upon my personal knowledge) there is probable cause to believe that the property, records or data hereinafter described (has been stolen, or is being concealed, or constitutes evidence of a particular offense, etc.) and may be found (in the possession of A. B. or any other person or corporation) at premises (identify).

4. The (property, records, or data) for which I seek issuance of a search warrant is the following: (here describe the property, records, or data as particularly as possible).

SECTION 9.  Section 3A of said chapter 276, as so appearing, is hereby amended by inserting after the word “search”, in line 1, the following words:- or to obtain electronic communication, remote computing or location information records.

SECTION 10. Said section 3A of said chapter 276, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out, in line 6, the word “search”.