HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1910 FILED ON: 1/15/2015
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 2049
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Jeffrey Sánchez
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act relative to lead abatement.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: | Date Added: |
Jeffrey Sánchez | 15th Suffolk | 1/15/2015 |
Linda Dorcena Forry | First Suffolk | 10/11/2019 |
Daniel J. Hunt | 13th Suffolk | 10/11/2019 |
Daniel J. Ryan | 2nd Suffolk | 10/11/2019 |
Sal N. DiDomenico | Middlesex and Suffolk | 10/11/2019 |
Jason M. Lewis | Fifth Middlesex | 10/11/2019 |
Evandro C. Carvalho | 5th Suffolk | 10/11/2019 |
Daniel Cullinane | 12th Suffolk | 10/11/2019 |
Nick Collins | 4th Suffolk | 10/11/2019 |
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1910 FILED ON: 1/15/2015
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 2049
By Mr. Sánchez of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2049) of Jeffrey Sánchez and others relative to the impact of lead exposure on children. Public Health. |
[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 4258 OF 2013-2014.]
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Eighty-Ninth General Court
(2015-2016)
_______________
An Act relative to lead abatement.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. Subsection (e) of section 6 of chapter 62 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2012 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking out, in the first sentence, the words “one thousand five hundred dollars” and inserting in place thereof the following words: - three thousand dollars
SECTION 2. Subsection (e) of section 6 of said chapter 62, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out, in the second sentence, the words “five hundred dollars” and inserting in place thereof the following words: - one thousand dollars
SECTION 3. Section 191 of chapter 111 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2012 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the last sentence in the first paragraph the following sentences:-
This section shall not limit the right of any local board of health to establish and enforce lead poisoning standards more strict than those set forth in the general laws or the provisions of the state sanitary code, provided however that a local board of health may not establish standards that are more permissive than state requirements.
SECTION 4. Section 5 of chapter 151B of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2012 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking out, in clause (a) of the last paragraph, the dollar amount “$10,000” and inserting in place thereof the following dollar amount: - $20,000
SECTION 5. Section 5 of said chapter 151B of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out, in clause (b) of the last paragraph, the dollar amount “$25,000” and inserting in place thereof the following dollar amount: - $35,000
SECTION 6. Section 5 of said chapter 151B of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out, in clause (c) of the last paragraph, the dollar amount “$50,000” and inserting in place thereof the following dollar amount: - $60,000
SECTION 7. The department of public health shall file a report with the house and senate committees on ways and means, the joint committee on public health and the joint committee on health care financing on the status of childhood lead poisoning in the commonwealth, including but not limited to a review of: 1) existing lead poisoning regulations and recommendations on possible regulatory amendments; 2) current medical practice and federal guidelines on childhood lead poisoning; 3) recommendations of policies for children at risk of lead exposure; 4) costs of providing services and enforcement at both the state and local level; and 5) the potential for state and local incentive grants so that local boards of health could enforce a lower lead poisoning level.