HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 369        FILED ON: 1/13/2015

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 3242

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Ellen Story and Todd M. Smola

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act establishing the genetic engineering transparency food and seed labeling act.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Ellen Story

3rd Hampshire

1/13/2015

Todd M. Smola

1st Hampden

1/13/2015

Joan B.  Lovely

Second Essex

1/20/2015

Bruce E. Tarr

First Essex and Middlesex

1/17/2015

Michael J. Moran

18th Suffolk

1/16/2015

Daniel A. Wolf

Cape and Islands

1/29/2015

Stephen L. DiNatale

3rd Worcester

1/14/2015

Sarah K. Peake

4th Barnstable

1/15/2015

Carolyn C. Dykema

8th Middlesex

1/28/2015

Tricia Farley-Bouvier

3rd Berkshire

1/26/2015

Byron Rushing

9th Suffolk

1/30/2015

James B. Eldridge

Middlesex and Worcester

1/26/2015

Timothy R. Madden

Barnstable, Dukes and Nantucket

1/15/2015

Brian R. Mannal

2nd Barnstable

1/26/2015

Marjorie C. Decker

25th Middlesex

1/26/2015

Peter V. Kocot

1st Hampshire

1/15/2015

Mary S. Keefe

15th Worcester

1/30/2015

Gailanne M. Cariddi

1st Berkshire

1/16/2015

Kathleen O'Connor Ives

First Essex

1/16/2015

Nicholas A. Boldyga

3rd Hampden

1/29/2015

Gloria L. Fox

7th Suffolk

1/26/2015

James Arciero

2nd Middlesex

1/20/2015

Brian M. Ashe

2nd Hampden

1/15/2015

Cory Atkins

14th Middlesex

1/23/2015

Bruce J. Ayers

1st Norfolk

2/4/2015

Ruth B. Balser

12th Middlesex

1/26/2015

Christine P. Barber

34th Middlesex

2/1/2015

Michael J. Barrett

Third Middlesex

1/26/2015

F. Jay Barrows

1st Bristol

1/28/2015

Jennifer E. Benson

37th Middlesex

1/16/2015

Donald R. Berthiaume, Jr.

5th Worcester

2/1/2015

Paul Brodeur

32nd Middlesex

1/30/2015

Antonio F. D. Cabral

13th Bristol

2/3/2015

Kate D. Campanale

17th Worcester

2/3/2015

Harriette L. Chandler

First Worcester

2/2/2015

Leah Cole

12th Essex

1/15/2015

Edward F. Coppinger

10th Suffolk

1/29/2015

Cynthia S. Creem

First Middlesex and Norfolk

1/26/2015

Brendan P. Crighton

11th Essex

1/30/2015

Claire D. Cronin

11th Plymouth

1/26/2015

Daniel Cullinane

12th Suffolk

2/2/2015

Mark J. Cusack

5th Norfolk

2/4/2015

Josh S. Cutler

6th Plymouth

1/22/2015

Michael S. Day

31st Middlesex

2/3/2015

Viriato M. deMacedo

Plymouth and Barnstable

1/30/2015

Angelo L. D'Emilia

8th Plymouth

1/30/2015

Marcos A. Devers

16th Essex

2/1/2015

Sal N. DiDomenico

Middlesex and Suffolk

1/29/2015

Geoff Diehl

7th Plymouth

1/26/2015

Daniel M. Donahue

16th Worcester

1/30/2015

Paul J. Donato

35th Middlesex

1/29/2015

Kenneth J. Donnelly

Fourth Middlesex

1/22/2015

Shawn Dooley

9th Norfolk

1/22/2015

Benjamin B. Downing

Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin and Hampden

1/29/2015

Michelle M. DuBois

10th Plymouth

1/22/2015

Peter J. Durant

6th Worcester

1/21/2015

James J. Dwyer

30th Middlesex

1/26/2015

Lori A. Ehrlich

8th Essex

1/22/2015

Ryan C. Fattman

Worcester and Norfolk

1/13/2015

Kimberly N. Ferguson

1st Worcester

1/22/2015

John V. Fernandes

10th Worcester

1/30/2015

Ann-Margaret Ferrante

5th Essex

1/16/2015

Michael J. Finn

6th Hampden

1/26/2015

Carole A. Fiola

6th Bristol

1/28/2015

Jennifer L. Flanagan

Worcester and Middlesex

2/2/2015

Linda Dorcena Forry

First Suffolk

1/22/2015

Paul K. Frost

7th Worcester

1/29/2015

William C. Galvin

6th Norfolk

1/29/2015

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

1/19/2015

Denise C. Garlick

13th Norfolk

2/1/2015

Colleen M. Garry

36th Middlesex

1/26/2015

Carmine L. Gentile

13th Middlesex

1/27/2015

Susan Williams Gifford

2nd Plymouth

2/2/2015

Anne M. Gobi

Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire and Middlesex

2/3/2015

Thomas A. Golden, Jr.

16th Middlesex

2/3/2015

Kenneth I. Gordon

21st Middlesex

1/23/2015

Danielle W. Gregoire

4th Middlesex

1/29/2015

Jonathan Hecht

29th Middlesex

1/22/2015

Robert L. Hedlund

Plymouth and Norfolk

1/22/2015

Paul R. Heroux

2nd Bristol

1/29/2015

Bradford R. Hill

4th Essex

1/30/2015

Kate Hogan

3rd Middlesex

2/2/2015

Kevin G. Honan

17th Suffolk

2/3/2015

Steven S. Howitt

4th Bristol

2/3/2015

Donald F. Humason, Jr.

Second Hampden and Hampshire

1/30/2015

Patricia D. Jehlen

Second Middlesex

1/29/2015

Bradley H. Jones, Jr.

20th Middlesex

1/26/2015

Brian A. Joyce

Norfolk, Bristol and Plymouth

1/22/2015

Louis L. Kafka

8th Norfolk

1/22/2015

Jay R. Kaufman

15th Middlesex

1/15/2015

James M. Kelcourse

1st Essex

1/28/2015

Thomas P. Kennedy

Second Plymouth and Bristol

1/31/2015

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex

1/27/2015

Robert M. Koczera

11th Bristol

2/4/2015

Stephen Kulik

1st Franklin

1/23/2015

Kevin J. Kuros

8th Worcester

2/2/2015

John J. Lawn, Jr.

10th Middlesex

2/3/2015

Eric P. Lesser

First Hampden and Hampshire

1/29/2015

Jason M. Lewis

Fifth Middlesex

1/20/2015

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

1/21/2015

Barbara A. L'Italien

Second Essex and Middlesex

1/29/2015

Jay D. Livingstone

8th Suffolk

1/15/2015

Marc T. Lombardo

22nd Middlesex

1/22/2015

John J. Mahoney

13th Worcester

2/3/2015

Elizabeth A. Malia

11th Suffolk

2/4/2015

Paul W. Mark

2nd Berkshire

1/14/2015

Christopher M. Markey

9th Bristol

2/3/2015

Thomas M. McGee

Third Essex

1/29/2015

Joseph W. McGonagle, Jr.

28th Middlesex

1/28/2015

Joseph D. McKenna

18th Worcester

1/29/2015

Paul McMurtry

11th Norfolk

1/26/2015

James R. Miceli

19th Middlesex

1/16/2015

Aaron Michlewitz

3rd Suffolk

1/30/2015

Leonard Mirra

2nd Essex

1/26/2015

Rady Mom

18th Middlesex

1/22/2015

Mark C. Montigny

Second Bristol and Plymouth

2/2/2015

Michael O. Moore

Second Worcester

1/26/2015

Frank A. Moran

17th Essex

1/26/2015

David K. Muradian, Jr.

9th Worcester

2/2/2015

Mathew Muratore

1st Plymouth

1/22/2015

David M. Nangle

17th Middlesex

1/26/2015

Harold P. Naughton, Jr.

12th Worcester

1/29/2015

Shaunna L. O'Connell

3rd Bristol

1/31/2015

James J. O'Day

14th Worcester

2/3/2015

Alice Hanlon Peisch

14th Norfolk

2/4/2015

Thomas M. Petrolati

7th Hampden

2/4/2015

William Smitty Pignatelli

4th Berkshire

1/16/2015

Elizabeth A. Poirier

14th Bristol

1/15/2015

Denise Provost

27th Middlesex

1/23/2015

Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr.

12th Hampden

1/20/2015

David M. Rogers

24th Middlesex

1/26/2015

John H. Rogers

12th Norfolk

2/2/2015

Dennis A. Rosa

4th Worcester

1/23/2015

Jeffrey N. Roy

10th Norfolk

1/27/2015

Daniel J. Ryan

2nd Suffolk

1/30/2015

Tom Sannicandro

7th Middlesex

1/30/2015

John W. Scibak

2nd Hampshire

2/4/2015

Frank I. Smizik

15th Norfolk

1/30/2015

Theodore C. Speliotis

13th Essex

2/3/2015

Karen E. Spilka

Second Middlesex and Norfolk

1/28/2015

Thomas M. Stanley

9th Middlesex

1/20/2015

Benjamin Swan

11th Hampden

2/3/2015

Walter F. Timilty

7th Norfolk

2/2/2015

Timothy J. Toomey, Jr.

26th Middlesex

2/3/2015

Paul Tucker

7th Essex

2/3/2015

Aaron Vega

5th Hampden

1/21/2015

John C. Velis

4th Hampden

1/28/2015

RoseLee Vincent

16th Suffolk

1/26/2015

Chris Walsh

6th Middlesex

1/19/2015

James T. Welch

Hampden

2/2/2015

Timothy R. Whelan

1st Barnstable

1/29/2015

Susannah M. Whipps Lee

2nd Franklin

1/20/2015

Donald H. Wong

9th Essex

1/30/2015

Jonathan D. Zlotnik

2nd Worcester

2/2/2015


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 369        FILED ON: 1/13/2015

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 3242

By Representatives Story of Amherst and Smola of Warren, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3242) of Ellen Story, Todd M. Smola and others relative to the labeling of genetically engineered food.  Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture.

 

[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 3996 OF 2013-2014.]

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Eighty-Ninth General Court
(2015-2016)

_______________

 

An Act establishing the genetic engineering transparency food and seed labeling act.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. (1) This act shall be known as the Genetic Engineering Transparency Food and Seed Labeling Act.

(2) The Genetic Engineering Transparency Food and Seed Labeling Act results in a consistent and enforceable standard for labeling foods and seeds produced using genetic engineering, and thus provides the residents of the commonwealth with necessary factual knowledge of how their food is produced. This knowledge is necessary for the following reasons:

(a) Public health.  Promote public health by allowing the food protection program to inform consumers regarding genetically engineered foods, and serve as a risk management tool enabling consumers, physicians, and scientists to identify unintended health effects resulting from consumption of genetically engineered foods.

(b) Environmental impacts. Assist consumers who are concerned about the potential effects of genetic engineering on the environment to make informed purchasing decisions.

(c) Consumer protection. Reduce and prevent consumer confusion and deception and promote the disclosure of factual information on food and seed labels to allow consumers to make informed decisions.

(d) Economic development. Create and protect non-genetically engineered crop markets and enable consumers to make informed purchasing decisions.

(e) Religious and cultural freedom. Provide consumers with data from which they may make informed decisions for personal, religious, moral, cultural, or ethical reasons.

(3) This act shall be liberally construed to fulfill these purposes.

SECTION 2. Section 1 of Chapter 94 of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting after line 54 the following:-

“Genetically engineered” means produced from an organism or organisms in which the genetic material has been changed through the application of:

(a) In vitro nucleic acid techniques which include, but are not limited to, recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid or ribonucleic acid techniques that use vector systems, and techniques involving the direct introduction into the organisms of hereditary materials prepared outside the organisms such as biolistics, microinjection, macro-injection, chemoporation, electroporation, microencapsulation, and liposome fusion as well as direct injection of nucleic acid into cells or organelles, encapsulation, gene deletion, and doubling; or

(b) Methods of fusing cells beyond the taxonomic family that overcome natural physiological, reproductive, or recombination barriers, and that are not techniques used in traditional breeding and selection such as conjugation, transduction, and hybridization.

SECTION 3. Said Chapter 94 is hereby further amended by inserting at the end thereof the following new section:-

Section 330. The Genetic Engineering Transparency Food and Seed Labeling Act.

(1) For the purposes of this section, the following words shall have the following definitions:-

“Food” shall have the same meaning given to it in section 1 of this chapter, with the following exceptions:-

(a) food products and seeds consumed by animals;

(b) any alcoholic beverages as defined by Section 1 of Chapter 138 of the General Laws;

(c) any food or beverage that meets the definition of “medical food” in paragraph 3 of subsection (b) of Section 360ee of Title 21 of the United States Code, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or any successor statute;

(d) food not packaged for retail sale that is either:

(i) prepared and intended for immediate human consumption, or

(ii) served, sold or otherwise provided in any restaurant or other food service establishment that is primarily engaged in the sale of food prepared or intended for immediate human consumption

“Packaged food” means any food exposed for retail sale in Massachusetts, other than raw food and food served, sold, or provided ready to eat in any bake sale, commissary or food service establishment

“Raw agricultural commodity” and “Raw food product” shall mean any product derived from the science, art or practice of cultivating the soil, producing crops or raising livestock or fish, and, in varying degrees, including the preparation and marketing of the resulting products, but prior to their processing or combination into a food product.

(2)  Any food product that is entirely or partially produced with genetic engineering shall be labeled in accordance with the provisions of this section.

(3) In the case of a genetically engineered raw food product packaged for retail sale, the manufacturer shall include the words “Genetically Engineered” or “Produced with Genetic Engineering” clearly and conspicuously on the front or back of the package of such commodity. In the case of raw agricultural commodities that are not separately packaged or labeled, the retailer shall place a clear and conspicuous label bearing those words on the retail store shelf or bin in which such commodity is displayed for sale.

(4) To make clear who is responsible for compliance with the requirements of this section, in the case of a raw food product, the retailer is responsible only for point of purchase shelf labeling. The supplier must label each container used for packaging, holding, and/or transporting any raw food product produced with genetic engineering that is delivered directly to Massachusetts retailers.

(5) In the case of any packaged food product containing some products of genetic engineering, the manufacturer must label the product in clear and conspicuous language on the front or back of the package of such food product with the words “Produced with Genetic Engineering” or “Partially Produced with Genetic Engineering.”

(6) This law does not require either the listing or identification of any ingredient or ingredients that were genetically engineered or that the term “genetically engineered” be placed immediately preceding any common name or primary product descriptor of a food product.

(7) An animal that has not itself been genetically engineered, regardless of whether such animal has been fed or injected with any food or any drug that has been produced through means of genetic engineering shall not be considered “genetically engineered” for purposes of this section.

(8) Commencing January 1, 2017 a food product produced entirely or in part from genetic engineering shall not be labeled on the product, in signage, or in advertising as “natural,” “naturally made,” “naturally grown,” “all natural,” or any words of similar import.

(9) The food protection program of the department of public health shall promulgate regulations and guidelines necessary to implement this section. The food protection program shall not exempt any food products not expressly exempted by this section, but may authorize reasonable accommodations for products that due to peculiar size, packaging or storage requirements, are able to demonstrate a hardship in complying with the labeling called for by this act.

(10) The provisions of this section shall be enforced by the department and by local boards of health acting under the supervision of the department. Should the department deem necessary, the attorney general shall issue a corrective action notice to any manufacturer or retailer, describing a possible violation and how to remedy it. Such corrective action notice shall also explain what documentation under subsection 13 may satisfy this section. Upon request of the attorney general, the respondent manufacturer or retailer shall provide records and evidence demonstrating compliance with this section up to 3 years prior to the alleged violation. If, after 30 days from the issuance of said corrective action notice the attorney general believes the violation has not been remedied, the attorney general may bring an action to enjoin a violation of this section in any court of competent jurisdiction. A violation of this section shall be punishable by a civil penalty of not more than $1000 per day, per product; provided, that said penalty shall accrue and be assessed per each uniquely named, designated, or marketed product, and shall not be made or multiplied by the number of individual packages exposed for retail sale.

(11) Any injured citizen of Massachusetts may, after giving notice of the alleged violation to the food protection program and the alleged violator and waiting 60 days, bring an action to enjoin a violation of this section by a manufacturer or retailer in any court of competent jurisdiction. The court may, in such an action, award to a citizen who is a prevailing plaintiff reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in investigating and prosecuting the action, but the court may not award any further monetary damages.

(12) No person may be subject to an injunction or responsible for payment of prevailing party attorneys’ fees for failure to label any food if:

(a) in the case of packaged food, the materials produced through genetic engineering do not account for more than nine tenths of one percent of the total weight of the packaged food; or

(b) the food has not been produced with the knowing or intentional use of genetic engineering; or

(c) the food protection program and court of jurisdiction are satisfied that the food product has been duly labeled, upon conclusion of an investigation and proceeding under Section 189A.

(13) For purposes of this section, food will be considered not to have been produced with the knowing or intentional use of genetic engineering if:

(a) such food is lawfully certified to be labeled, marketed, and offered for sale as “organic” pursuant to the section 6501 of Title 7 of the United States Code, the Organic Foods Production Act, or any successor statute, which already prohibits genetic engineering;

(b) in the case of a manufacturer or retailer obligated to label any food under this act, if such entity has obtained from whomever sold that food to them a statement signed under pains and penalty of perjury that the food has not been knowingly or intentionally genetically engineered and has been segregated from, and not knowingly or intentionally commingled with, foods that may have been genetically engineered at any time. In providing such statement, a manufacturer or retailer may rely on such statement from a supplier that contains such an affirmation signed under pains and penalty of perjury; or

(c) the food protection program or an independent organization has determined that the food has not been knowingly or intentionally genetically engineered and has been segregated from, and not knowingly or intentionally commingled with, foods that may have been genetically engineered at any time, if such a determination has been made pursuant to a sampling and testing procedure (i) consistent with sampling and testing principles recommended by internationally recognized standards organizations and (ii) which does not rely on testing processed foods in which no DNA is detectable.

(14) It shall be a violation of this section for any retailer, wholesaler or distributor to knowingly and willfully remove, alter or obscure any label affixed under this section, or to knowingly and willfully fail to provide point of purchase labeling for unpackaged raw agricultural commodities. In any action in which it is alleged that a retailer has violated the provisions of this section, it shall be an affirmative defense that such retailer reasonably relied on:

(a) any disclosure whether a food was produced through genetic engineering contained in the bill of sale or invoice provided by the wholesaler or distributor; or

(b) a lack of such disclosure.

(15) No action may be brought against any farmer for any violation of any provision of this section unless such farmer is also a retailer or manufacturer, but any farmer submitting a false sworn statement under paragraph (b) of subsection (13) of this section shall be subject to section 1A of chapter 268 of the General Laws.

SECTION 4. Section 187 of said chapter 94 is hereby amended by inserting after the words “misleading labeling.” in line 137 the following paragraph:-

“Fifteenth, if it is intended for human consumption and genetically engineered, as defined in section 1 of this chapter, and does not bear labeling in accordance with section 330 of this chapter.

SECTION 5. Section 84 of Chapter 128 of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting after the definition of “Flower seeds” the following definitions:-

“Genetically engineered seed” shall mean any agricultural, flower, tree and shrub, vegetable or weed seed produced from an organism or organisms in which the genetic material has been changed through the application of:

(a) In vitro nucleic acid techniques which include, but are not limited to, recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid or ribonucleic acid, direct injection of nucleic acid into cells or organelles, encapsulation, gene deletion, and doubling, recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid or ribonucleic acid techniques that use vector systems, and techniques involving the direct introduction into the organisms of hereditary materials prepared outside the organisms such as biolistics, microinjection, macro-injection, chemoporation, electroporation, microencapsulation, and liposome fusion; or

(b) Methods of fusing cells beyond the taxonomic family that overcome natural physiological, reproductive, or recombination barriers, and that are not techniques used in traditional breeding and selection such as conjugation, transduction, and hybridization.

“Genetically engineered plant part” shall mean a whole plant or plant part, including scions intended for planting, which contains material derived from a genetically engineered seed or is itself produced using the methods described in the definition of genetically engineered seed.

SECTION 6. Said Chapter 128 is hereby amended by adding after section 89 the following new section:-

Section 89A. Genetically engineered seeds; labeling or tagging containers

Each container of genetically engineered seed distributed, offered for sale or exposed for sale within the commonwealth shall bear the identity of such seed, relevant traits or characteristics of the seed that cause it to be defined as genetically engineered, plus any legal requirements or recommended precautions for their safe handling, storage, transport, and use, the contact point for further information and, as appropriate, the name and address of the manufacturer, distributor, or supplier of such seed.

The commissioner shall promulgate regulations requiring the annual reporting by manufacturers or processors of all genetically engineered seed and genetically engineered plant parts distributed, sold or exposed for sale within the commonwealth, as to the nature of sales of genetically engineered seed and genetically engineered plant products during the previous calendar year.

SECTION 7. Section 93 of said Chapter 128 is hereby amended in line 3 by striking out the words “flower or tree and shrub”, and inserting in place thereof the following words:-

“flower, tree and shrub or genetically engineered”

SECTION 8. Said Section 93 is hereby further amended in line 11 by striking out the words “flower and tree or shrub”, and inserting in place thereof the following words:-

“flower, tree and shrub or genetically engineered”

SECTION 9. This act shall take effect January 1, 2017.