HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 4590        FILED ON: 3/3/2016

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 4265

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Michelle M. DuBois and Carmine L. Gentile

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act to protect victims of rape and children conceived during the commission of said offense.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Michelle M. DuBois

10th Plymouth

3/3/2016

Carmine L. Gentile

13th Middlesex

3/3/2016

Brian M. Ashe

2nd Hampden

3/8/2016

Christine P. Barber

34th Middlesex

3/8/2016

Donald R. Berthiaume, Jr.

5th Worcester

3/14/2016

Nicholas A. Boldyga

3rd Hampden

3/14/2016

Harriette L. Chandler

First Worcester

3/8/2016

Edward F. Coppinger

10th Suffolk

3/11/2016

Josh S. Cutler

6th Plymouth

7/9/2019

David F. DeCoste

5th Plymouth

3/9/2016

Sal N. DiDomenico

Middlesex and Suffolk

3/9/2016

Diana DiZoglio

14th Essex

3/9/2016

James J. Dwyer

30th Middlesex

3/8/2016

James B. Eldridge

Middlesex and Worcester

3/13/2016

Carole A. Fiola

6th Bristol

3/11/2016

Colleen M. Garry

36th Middlesex

3/8/2016

Randy Hunt

5th Barnstable

3/10/2016

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex

3/10/2016

Barbara A. L'Italien

Second Essex and Middlesex

3/11/2016

Joan B.  Lovely

Second Essex

3/9/2016

Michael O. Moore

Second Worcester

3/10/2016

Mathew Muratore

1st Plymouth

3/9/2016

Keiko M. Orrall

12th Bristol

3/10/2016

Elizabeth A. Poirier

14th Bristol

3/16/2016

Denise Provost

27th Middlesex

3/8/2016

Tom Sannicandro

7th Middlesex

3/8/2016

Jose F. Tosado

9th Hampden

3/11/2016

Steven Ultrino

33rd Middlesex

3/14/2016

Chris Walsh

6th Middlesex

3/8/2016


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 4590        FILED ON: 3/3/2016

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 4265

By Representatives DuBois of Brockton and Gentile of Sudbury, a petition (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Michelle M. DuBois, Carmine L. Gentile and others for legislation to protect victims of rape and children conceived during the commission of said offense.  The Judiciary.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Eighty-Ninth General Court
(2015-2016)

_______________

 

An Act to protect victims of rape and children conceived during the commission of said offense.

 

Whereas, The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purpose, which is to protect rape victims and their children and to ensure that convicted rapists cannot use the court system to further assault said rape victim, therefore it is hereby declared to be an emergency law, necessary for the immediate preservation of the public safety.
 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1.  Subsection (a) of section 3 of chapter 209C of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking out the last sentence.

SECTION 2.  The first paragraph of subsection (e) of section 10 of said chapter 209C, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out the last sentence.

SECTION 3. Said chapter 209C is hereby amended by inserting after section 10 the following section:-

Section 10A. (a) (1) Upon or after the adjudication of an assault or rape under section 13B to 13B 3/4, inclusive, 13F, 13H, or 22 to 23B, inclusive, of chapter 265, or section 2, 3, 4 or 17 of chapter 272, the court that maintained jurisdiction for the adjudication where a defendant was convicted of, was granted a continuance without a finding for or otherwise pleaded guilty to said offense shall hold a hearing to determine if a child was conceived during the commission of said offense.

In these matters when the court finds upon a showing by a preponderance of evidence that pregnancy was caused by unwanted sexual conduct, no parental rights can be presumed, adjudicated or established, nor can the probate and family court assert jurisdiction to determine the rights or interests of any person with regard to said pregnancy or child born from said pregnancy.

(2) If the court finds upon a showing by a preponderance of evidence that a child was conceived during the commission of said offense and the defendant is the biological source of the child’s conception: (1) a rebuttable presumption shall be established that the defendant is unfit and it is not in the best interests of the child to be placed in sole custody, shared legal custody, or shared physical custody with the defendant; provided that, this presumption may be overcome with regard to shared legal custody or shared physical custody but not sole custody by clear and convincing evidence substantiated by the Judge’s written finding of facts that the defendant is a fit parent and as such shared legal custody or shared physical custody is by the Judge’s written finding of facts in the best interests of the child and the other parent of the child conceived during the commission of that offense consents to such shared legal custody or shared physical custody; (2) the court may make a new custody order as to the legal and physical custodial rights of the defendant; and (3) the court may modify any previous award granted to the defendant for sole custody, shared legal custody or shared physical custody of the child.  

(b) Notwithstanding section 10, no court shall make an order providing visitation rights to a  person who is the biological source of a child’s conception if that person was convicted of, was granted a continuance without a finding for or otherwise pleaded guilty to an assault or rape under section 13B to 13B 3/4, inclusive, 13F, 13H, or 22 to 23B, inclusive, of chapter 265, or section 2, 3, 4 or 17 of chapter 272 and is seeking to obtain visitation with the child who was conceived during the commission of that offense, unless the judge makes an independent determination substantiated by the Judge’s written finding of facts that visitation is in the best interests of the child and the other parent of the child conceived during the commission of that offense consents to such visitation.

(c) Notwithstanding section 3 of chapter 215, the court that maintained jurisdiction for the proceeding in which the defendant was convicted of, was granted a continuance without a finding for or otherwise pleaded guilty to section 13B to 13B 3/4, inclusive, 13F, 13H, or 22 to 23B, inclusive, of chapter 265, or section 2, 3, 4 or 17 of chapter 272 shall possess exclusive jurisdiction over: (i) a proceeding pursuant to this section or any modification of an order made hereunder; (ii) any action or order related to the defendant’s physical and legal custodial of the child conceived during the commission of the offense, regardless of when any such action or order was filed or adjudicated; and (iii) an action to require the convicted defendant to pay monetary restitution for the consequences of conception during unwanted sexual conduct (pursuant to MGL Ch 119A) and any modification of an order or judgment resulting from such support action.