SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1449 FILED ON: 1/16/2015
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1725
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Bruce E. Tarr
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act justifying the use of project labor agreements.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: |
Bruce E. Tarr | First Essex and Middlesex |
Keiko M. Orrall | 12th Bristol |
Shawn Dooley | 9th Norfolk |
Angelo L. D'Emilia | 8th Plymouth |
SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1449 FILED ON: 1/16/2015
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1725
By Mr. Tarr, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1725) of Bruce E. Tarr, Keiko M. Orrall, Shawn Dooley and Angelo L. D'Emilia for legislation to justify the use of project labor agreements. State Administration and Regulatory Oversight. |
[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE SENATE, NO. 1547 OF 2013-2014.]
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Eighty-Ninth General Court
(2015-2016)
_______________
An Act justifying the use of project labor agreements.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, an awarding authority electing to require a project labor agreement shall, within sixty days of said decision, submit a report to the inspector general:
(1) stating that the project is of such size, duration, timing and complexity that a project labor agreement is required; and
(2) providing a comparative analysis of any benefits of the project labor agreement that led the awarding authority to conclude that such an agreement was required, and any increased costs or adverse impacts caused by the agreement.