SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1626 FILED ON: 1/16/2015
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 87
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Barbara A. L'Italien
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act to provide equal access to evaluations for children with disabilities.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: |
|
Barbara A. L'Italien | Second Essex and Middlesex |
|
Marjorie C. Decker | 25th Middlesex |
|
Michael O. Moore | Second Worcester |
|
Sal N. DiDomenico | Middlesex and Suffolk |
|
William N. Brownsberger | Second Suffolk and Middlesex |
|
Carolyn C. Dykema | 8th Middlesex |
|
Michael J. Barrett | Third Middlesex |
|
Jason M. Lewis | Fifth Middlesex |
|
Anne M. Gobi | Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire and Middlesex |
|
James B. Eldridge | Middlesex and Worcester |
|
John F. Keenan | Norfolk and Plymouth |
|
Brian A. Joyce | Norfolk, Bristol and Plymouth |
|
Joan B. Lovely | Second Essex |
|
Danielle W. Gregoire | 4th Middlesex |
|
Marcos A. Devers | 16th Essex |
|
Walter F. Timilty | 7th Norfolk |
|
Thomas M. McGee | Third Essex | 4/24/2015 |
Sean Garballey | 23rd Middlesex | 7/29/2015 |
SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1626 FILED ON: 1/16/2015
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 87
By Mrs. L'Italien, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 87) of Barbara L'Italien, Marjorie C. Decker, Michael O. Moore, Sal N. DiDomenico and other members of the General Court for legislation to provide equal access to evaluations for children with disabilities. Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities. |
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Eighty-Ninth General Court
(2015-2016)
_______________
An Act to provide equal access to evaluations for children with disabilities.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Whereas parents’ full participation in the planning and development of special education services for their child is required under state and federal special education law;
Whereas appropriate educational evaluations are vital to a child’s special education development, and independent educational evaluations provide the only way for parents to participate effectively in special education planning in the unusual situation where they disagree with a school district evaluation;
Whereas parents have the right to an independent educational evaluation under state and federal special education law, but this right is meaningless if the rates established by the state are so low that evaluators will not perform these evaluations;
Therefore, it is imperative to establish a reasonable rate structure that is fair to school districts and, at the same time, allows low- and moderate-income parents access to independent education evaluations.
SECTION 1. Section 13C of chapter 118E of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2012 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the first paragraph the following new paragraph:-
Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, the secretary of health and human services shall establish rates specific to independent evaluations in accordance with the rate standards established in this paragraph. To ensure that parents can participate fully and effectively with school personnel in the consideration and development of appropriate educational programs for their child, rates shall be at levels that provide parents with a choice of evaluators who can complete the evaluation in a timely manner and who have sufficient experience and expertise to determine the nature and extent of the child’s disability and to determine the nature and extent of the child’s educational needs and how they should be met. Rates shall allow payment of any or all of the following, as needed by the evaluator to make such determinations: formal and informal testing; interviews of child and parents; review of the child’s educational records and schoolwork; obtaining and reviewing relevant information from the child’s teachers, therapists and persons who have evaluated the child; observation of the child at school, at home, at a workplace and in the community; observation of any program proposed for the child, including both academic and non-academic components; testing and other formal and informal assessments sufficient to conduct transition evaluations pursuant to section 2 of chapter 71B and 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.; a comprehensive written report; attendance at the required team meeting that considers the evaluation and report; and travel time and expenses. A parent may file a request with the bureau of special education appeals and a hearing officer may order a higher rate for a particular independent evaluation if necessary to meet the rate standards in this paragraph. At least every three years, the secretary of health and human services shall review the rates for independent evaluations and adjust the rates as necessary in order to comply with this section.
SECTION 2. The tenth paragraph of section 3 of chapter 71B of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2012 Official Edition, is hereby amended by deleting the words “educational assessments” and inserting in place thereof the following words:- independent evaluations.
SECTION 3. The tenth paragraph of section 3 of chapter 71B of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2012 Official Edition, is hereby further amended by inserting immediately after the words “conducted or performed by” the following word:- licensed.
SECTION 4. Section 3 of chapter 71B of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2012 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the twelfth paragraph the following new paragraph:-
Parents, guardians, or persons with custody who either have requested a hearing before the bureau of special education appeals or are parties to a proceeding initiated by a school committee at the bureau shall be entitled to reasonable expert fees and costs as a prevailing party.