HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1571        FILED ON: 1/19/2017

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1704

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Jeffrey N. Roy

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act to permit enhanced public access to deliberations of public bodies and to permit improved efficiency of public bodies.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Jeffrey N. Roy

10th Norfolk

1/19/2017

Karen E. Spilka

Second Middlesex and Norfolk

1/19/2017

Richard J. Ross

Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex

 

Josh S. Cutler

6th Plymouth

 

Mike Connolly

26th Middlesex

 

Brian Murray

10th Worcester

 

Paul McMurtry

11th Norfolk

 

Jennifer L. Flanagan

Worcester and Middlesex

 

Shawn Dooley

9th Norfolk

 

Bud Williams

11th Hampden

 

Bruce J. Ayers

1st Norfolk

2/2/2017

James M. Cantwell

4th Plymouth

2/2/2017

William L. Crocker, Jr.

2nd Barnstable

2/3/2017

Marjorie C. Decker

25th Middlesex

2/2/2017

Paul R. Heroux

2nd Bristol

1/31/2017

Natalie Higgins

4th Worcester

1/31/2017

Russell E. Holmes

6th Suffolk

2/3/2017

Mary S. Keefe

15th Worcester

2/2/2017

Jason M. Lewis

Fifth Middlesex

2/1/2017

James R. Miceli

19th Middlesex

2/3/2017

Frank I. Smizik

15th Norfolk

1/31/2017

Chris Walsh

6th Middlesex

2/3/2017


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1571        FILED ON: 1/19/2017

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1704

By Mr. Roy of Franklin, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1704) of Jeffrey N. Roy and others for legislation to permit enhanced public access to public Internet deliberations of public bodies and to permit improved efficiency of public bodies.  State Administration and Regulatory Oversight.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninetieth General Court
(2017-2018)

_______________

 

An Act to permit enhanced public access to deliberations of public bodies and to permit improved efficiency of public bodies.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

The definition of “Deliberation” in Section 18 of Chapter 30A of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the phrase “procedural meeting”, the following word:- “materials”.

SECTION 2. The definition of “Meeting” in said Section 18 of said Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out the word “by”, and inserting in place thereof the following words:- “at a gathering of”.

SECTION 3. The definition of “Meeting” in said Section 18 of said Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out the word “or” at the end of clause (d).

SECTION 4. The definition of “Meeting” in said Section 18 of said Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out the word, “session.” at the end of clause (e) and inserting in place thereof the following words, “session; or”.

SECTION 5. The definition of “Meeting” in said Section 18 of said Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by adding the following clause:-

(f) participation by members of a public body in a Public Internet Discussion.

SECTION 6. The definition of “Post Notice” in said Section 18 of said Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby amended by inserting after the word “meeting”, the following words: - “or a public internet discussion”.

SECTION 7. Said Section 18 of said Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by inserting after the definition of “Post Notice” the following definition:-

“Public Internet Discussion”, a discussion via the Internet by members of a public body, which may include matters within the body’s jurisdiction. All public Internet discussions shall be set up so that the public can monitor the discussion among members of the public body. At the discretion of the public body, a public Internet discussion may be set up so that some defined subset of the public can also make statements in the public Internet discussion. Everyone making statements in a public Internet discussion shall be authenticated, so that all statements can be accurately attributed to the person making them. No votes or formal actions may be taken in a public Internet discussion and there is no quorum requirement for a public Internet discussion.

SECTION 8. Section 20 of Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out subsection (a) in its entirety and inserting in place thereof the following subsection:-

(a)(1)Except as provided in Section 21, all meetings of a public body shall be open to the public.

(2)All public Internet discussions shall be open to the public in that members of the public must be able to monitor the proceedings via the Internet.

(3)No deliberations may take place except at

(i)Meetings,

(ii)Public Internet Discussions, or

(iii)gatherings that meet exceptions (d) or (e) under the definition of Meeting, as defined in Section 18.

SECTION 9. Said Section 20 of Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out subsection (b) in its entirety and inserting in place thereof the following subsection:-

(b) Except in an emergency, in addition to any notice otherwise required by law, a public body shall post notice of every meeting and public Internet discussion at least 48 hours prior to the start of such meeting or public Internet discussion, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. In an emergency, a public body shall post notice as soon as reasonably possible prior to such meeting or public Internet discussion. Notice shall be printed in a legible, easily understandable format and shall contain a listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at the meeting or public Internet discussion.

(1)In the case of a meeting, the notice also shall contain the date, time and place of the meeting.

(2)In the case of a public Internet discussion, the notice also shall contain the date and time of the start of the public internet discussion and shall state whether the public is limited to monitoring the discussion among members of the public body or whether some defined subset of the public can also make statements in the public Internet discussion. If some defined subset of the public can make statements in the public Internet discussion, the notice shall provide, or direct readers to, directions for members of that subset to get authenticated so that they can make statements in the public Internet discussion and their statements can be attributed accurately.

(3)In the case of a public Internet discussion held via an internet service such as a computer-mediated discussion, conference, forum or blog, it shall be publicly accessible and the notice shall include the URL (or URLs, if there are more than one) and any other information required to access the discussion and its archive.

(4)In the case of a public Internet discussion based on the exchange of discrete messages, it shall be possible for the public to subscribe to receive the messages and the messages shall be available from a publicly accessible archive. The notice shall include instructions for subscribing to the messages and instructions for accessing them from the archive.

(5)In the case of a continuing public Internet discussion, a notice that the public Internet discussion is continuing shall be reposted at least once a month. This notice shall include the instructions for accessing the public Internet discussion and its archive and shall list the topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed during the following month.

SECTION 10. Said Section 20 of Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by inserting after the word “meetings”, in each instance in which it appears in subsection (c), the following words:- “and public internet discussions”.

SECTION 11. Said Section 20 of Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking the word “The” at the beginning of subsection (d) and inserting in place thereof the following words:- “In the case of a physical meeting, the”.

SECTION 12. Said Section 20 of Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by inserting in subsection (d), at the end thereof, the following sentences:- "In the case of public Internet discussions, there is no concept of the physical location of the discussion. Independent of participants’ physical locations, when they are participating in a public Internet discussion, they are present at the discussion. The public must be offered the same access to see, read, or hear the proceedings as the members of the public body have themselves.”

SECTION 13. Section 22 of Chapter 30A, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out subsection (a) in its entirety and inserting in place thereof the following subsection:-

(a)(1)A public body shall create and maintain accurate minutes of all meetings, including executive sessions, setting forth the date, time and place, the members present or absent, a summary of the discussions on each subject, a list of documents and other exhibits used at the meeting, the decisions made and the actions taken at each meeting, including the record of all votes.

(2)All information exchanged during a public Internet discussion must be captured and maintained and be freely accessible via the Internet. Each message or statement must have an indication of the date and time it was made and the person who made it. All statements made or opinions expressed in a public Internet discussion are made solely on behalf of the person making the statement or expressing the opinion (independent of whether that person is a member of the public body or the public at large), not on behalf of the public body.