HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2842        FILED ON: 1/20/2017

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 2277

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Kimberly N. Ferguson

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act relative to the misrepresentation of a service animal.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Kimberly N. Ferguson

1st Worcester

1/20/2017

James Arciero

2nd Middlesex

2/3/2017

Cory Atkins

14th Middlesex

2/3/2017

Bruce J. Ayers

1st Norfolk

2/2/2017

Michael J. Barrett

Third Middlesex

2/1/2017

F. Jay Barrows

1st Bristol

2/2/2017

Donald R. Berthiaume, Jr.

5th Worcester

2/3/2017

Michael D. Brady

Second Plymouth and Bristol

2/1/2017

William N. Brownsberger

Second Suffolk and Middlesex

2/1/2017

Thomas J. Calter

12th Plymouth

2/3/2017

Kate D. Campanale

17th Worcester

2/3/2017

Daniel Cullinane

12th Suffolk

2/2/2017

Josh S. Cutler

6th Plymouth

2/2/2017

Julian Cyr

Cape and Islands

2/3/2017

David F. DeCoste

5th Plymouth

2/2/2017

Geoff Diehl

7th Plymouth

2/1/2017

Daniel M. Donahue

16th Worcester

2/1/2017

Shawn Dooley

9th Norfolk

1/25/2017

Peter J. Durant

6th Worcester

2/2/2017

Carolyn C. Dykema

8th Middlesex

2/2/2017

Carole A. Fiola

6th Bristol

2/2/2017

Paul K. Frost

7th Worcester

2/2/2017

Denise C. Garlick

13th Norfolk

2/2/2017

Carmine L. Gentile

13th Middlesex

1/31/2017

Susan Williams Gifford

2nd Plymouth

1/26/2017

Anne M. Gobi

Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire and Middlesex

2/2/2017

Solomon Goldstein-Rose

3rd Hampshire

2/1/2017

Natalie Higgins

4th Worcester

2/3/2017

Bradford R. Hill

4th Essex

2/1/2017

Kate Hogan

3rd Middlesex

2/1/2017

Steven S. Howitt

4th Bristol

2/1/2017

Daniel J. Hunt

13th Suffolk

2/2/2017

Bradley H. Jones, Jr.

20th Middlesex

2/1/2017

Hannah Kane

11th Worcester

1/29/2017

Kevin J. Kuros

8th Worcester

2/3/2017

John J. Lawn, Jr.

10th Middlesex

2/2/2017

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

1/31/2017

Joseph D. McKenna

18th Worcester

2/2/2017

Paul McMurtry

11th Norfolk

2/3/2017

James R. Miceli

19th Middlesex

1/25/2017

Michael O. Moore

Second Worcester

1/25/2017

Mathew Muratore

1st Plymouth

1/23/2017

James M. Murphy

4th Norfolk

2/3/2017

Harold P. Naughton, Jr.

12th Worcester

2/2/2017

Patrick M. O'Connor

Plymouth and Norfolk

2/3/2017

Alice Hanlon Peisch

14th Norfolk

2/3/2017

Elizabeth A. Poirier

14th Bristol

1/25/2017

David M. Rogers

24th Middlesex

2/3/2017

John H. Rogers

12th Norfolk

2/3/2017

Richard J. Ross

Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex

2/2/2017

Paul A. Schmid, III

8th Bristol

2/2/2017

Todd M. Smola

1st Hampden

1/31/2017

Thomas M. Stanley

9th Middlesex

2/2/2017

James E. Timilty

Bristol and Norfolk

2/1/2017

Aaron Vega

5th Hampden

1/26/2017

Chris Walsh

6th Middlesex

2/1/2017

Susannah M. Whipps

2nd Franklin

2/1/2017

Jonathan D. Zlotnik

2nd Worcester

2/2/2017

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

1/23/2017


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2842        FILED ON: 1/20/2017

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 2277

By Mrs. Ferguson of Holden, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2277) of Kimberly N. Ferguson and others relative to service animals and penalties for misrepresentation.  The Judiciary.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninetieth General Court
(2017-2018)

_______________

 

An Act relative to the misrepresentation of a service animal.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

Chapter 272 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after section 98A the following:-

Section 98B. (a) As used in this section, the following words shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

“Disability” has the same meaning as set forth in the deferral “Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990”, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq., and its related amendments implementing regulations.

“Service dog” has the same meaning as set forth in the implementing regulations of Title II and Title III of the federal “Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990”, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.

“Service-dog-in-training” means a dog or puppy that has been selected for service dog work and is being handled by a service-dog trainer .

“Service-dog trainer” means a competent dog trainer who is providing individual training of a dog or puppy with the intention of having the dog or puppy become a working service dog that will perform tasks for a disabled person.

(b) Business owners and individuals will continue to be protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

(c) The Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development Business shall prepare and make available to businesses upon request, (i)  a decal suitable for posting in a front window or door, stating that service dogs are welcome and that misrepresentation of a service dog is a violation of Massachusetts law, (ii) a brochure detailing permissible questions a business owner may ask in order to determine whether a dog is a service dog, proper answers to those questions, and guidelines defining unacceptable behavior.

(d) It shall be a civil infraction for any individual to misrepresent a pet dog as a service dog.  A violation of this section occurs when:

(1) An individual expressly or impliedly represents that a dog in his or her possession is his or her service dog or a service-dog-in-training for the purpose of obtaining any rights or privileges afforded disabled persons accompanied by service dogs, but unavailable to people and their pets, and

(2)Said individual knew or should have known that the dog in question did not meet the definition of a service animal or service-animal-in-training.

(3) It is an intentional misrepresentation and a violation of this section for an individual to take a dog into a place of public accommodation where pets are not permitted, and the dog is wearing a cape, vest, special leash, or other form of identification that states or implies that the dog is a service dog entitled to be present, even if the individual makes no affirmative statements.

(e) Any police or animal control officer may investigate and enforce this section by making inquiry of the individual accompanied by the dog in question and issuing a citation.  Refusal by the individual to answer the permissible questions shall create a presumption that the dog is not a service dog and the officer may issue the citation and require the individual to remove the dog from the place of public accommodation.

(f) A person who violates this section commits a civil infraction, punishable by 30 hours of community service for an organization that serves individuals with disabilities, or for another entity or organization at the discretion of the court, to be completed in not more than 6 months and/or pay a fine no more than $500.