HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2287        FILED ON: 1/19/2017

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 2362

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Claire D. Cronin

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act to clarify reimbursement of workers compensation insurers to prevent double recovery by injured workers in third party cases.

_______________

PETITION OF:

HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2287        FILED ON: 1/19/2017

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 2362

[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 3457 OF 2015-2016.]

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninetieth General Court
(2017-2018)

_______________

An Act to clarify reimbursement of workers compensation insurers to prevent double recovery by injured workers in third party cases.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Section 15 of chapter 152 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking out the third and fourth sentences and inserting in place thereof the following 2 sentences:-  The sum recovered attributed to damage elements for which compensation was paid shall be for the benefit of the insurer, unless such sum is greater than that paid by it to the employee, in which event the excess shall be retained by or paid to the employee. For the purposes of this section, “excess” shall mean the amount by which the gross sum received in payment attributed to damage elements for which compensation was paid exceeds the compensation paid under this chapter.

SECTION 2. Said section 15 of said chapter 152, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out the ninth and tenth sentences and inserting in place thereof the following 2 sentences:- At such hearing the court shall inquire and make a finding as to the taking of evidence on the merits of the settlement, on the fair allocation of amounts payable to the employee,  including amounts attributed to the employee’s pain and suffering, and amounts payable to the employee’s spouse, children, parents and any other member of the employee’s family or next of kin who may have claims arising from the injury for which are benefits are payable, under this chapter in which the action has been commenced after an opportunity has been afforded both the insurer and the employee to be heard on the merits of the settlement and on the amount, if any, to which the insurer is entitled out of such settlement by way of reimbursement, and on the amount of excess that shall be subject to offset against any future payment of benefits under this chapter by the insurer, which amount shall be determined at the time of such approval.  In determining the amount of “excess” that shall be subject to offset against any future compensation payment the board, the reviewing board, or the court in which the action has been commenced shall consider the fair allocation of amounts attributed to the employee’s pain and suffering, and amounts payable to and amongst family members who may have claims arising from the injury for which said compensation is payable.