HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 3896        FILED ON: 4/6/2017

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 3698

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Patricia A. Haddad

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act relative to internet privacy.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Patricia A. Haddad

5th Bristol

4/6/2017

Carole A. Fiola

6th Bristol

4/6/2017

James M. Cantwell

4th Plymouth

4/6/2017

Thomas P. Walsh

12th Essex

4/6/2017

Cory Atkins

14th Middlesex

4/6/2017

James B. Eldridge

Middlesex and Worcester

4/6/2017

David M. Rogers

24th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Jason M. Lewis

Fifth Middlesex

4/6/2017

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

4/6/2017

Tricia Farley-Bouvier

3rd Berkshire

4/6/2017

Linda Dean Campbell

15th Essex

4/6/2017

James J. O'Day

14th Worcester

4/6/2017

Natalie Higgins

4th Worcester

4/6/2017

Sarah K. Peake

4th Barnstable

4/6/2017

Anne M. Gobi

Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire and Middlesex

4/6/2017

Mark C. Montigny

Second Bristol and Plymouth

4/6/2017

Denise C. Garlick

13th Norfolk

4/6/2017

Jennifer E. Benson

37th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Claire D. Cronin

11th Plymouth

4/6/2017

Daniel M. Donahue

16th Worcester

4/6/2017

David T. Vieira

3rd Barnstable

4/6/2017

Alan Silvia

7th Bristol

4/6/2017

Tackey Chan

2nd Norfolk

4/6/2017

James R. Miceli

19th Middlesex

4/6/2017

William Driscoll

7th Norfolk

4/6/2017

Stephen Kulik

1st Franklin

4/6/2017

Michael S. Day

31st Middlesex

4/6/2017

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Carolyn C. Dykema

8th Middlesex

4/6/2017

John W. Scibak

2nd Hampshire

4/6/2017

Jonathan Hecht

29th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Kate Hogan

3rd Middlesex

4/6/2017

Paul McMurtry

11th Norfolk

4/6/2017

Marjorie C. Decker

25th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Elizabeth A. Malia

11th Suffolk

4/6/2017

Gailanne M. Cariddi

1st Berkshire

4/6/2017

Jeffrey N. Roy

10th Norfolk

4/6/2017

Kevin J. Kuros

8th Worcester

4/6/2017

Timothy R. Whelan

1st Barnstable

4/6/2017

Josh S. Cutler

6th Plymouth

4/6/2017

Carmine L. Gentile

13th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Bradley H. Jones, Jr.

20th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Peter V. Kocot

1st Hampshire

4/6/2017

John C. Velis

4th Hampden

4/6/2017

Ann-Margaret Ferrante

5th Essex

4/6/2017

Denise Provost

27th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Brian Murray

10th Worcester

4/6/2017

Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr.

12th Hampden

4/6/2017

Jay R. Kaufman

15th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Paul Tucker

7th Essex

4/6/2017

James J. Dwyer

30th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Jack Lewis

7th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Ruth B. Balser

12th Middlesex

4/6/2017

William C. Galvin

6th Norfolk

4/6/2017

Mike Connolly

26th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Robert M. Koczera

11th Bristol

4/6/2017

Paul W. Mark

2nd Berkshire

4/6/2017

Peter J. Durant

6th Worcester

4/12/2017

Daniel Cullinane

12th Suffolk

4/6/2017

Steven Ultrino

33rd Middlesex

4/6/2017

Elizabeth A. Poirier

14th Bristol

4/6/2017

Chris Walsh

6th Middlesex

4/6/2017

James Arciero

2nd Middlesex

4/6/2017

Paul Brodeur

32nd Middlesex

4/6/2017

Michael J. Barrett

Third Middlesex

4/6/2017

Aaron Vega

5th Hampden

4/6/2017

Christopher M. Markey

9th Bristol

4/6/2017

Sal N. DiDomenico

Middlesex and Suffolk

4/6/2017

Colleen M. Garry

36th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Smitty Pignatelli

4th Berkshire

4/6/2017

Dylan Fernandes

Barnstable, Dukes and Nantucket

4/6/2017

Steven S. Howitt

4th Bristol

4/6/2017

Paul J. Donato

35th Middlesex

4/6/2017

Alice Hanlon Peisch

14th Norfolk

4/6/2017

Shaunna L. O'Connell

3rd Bristol

4/6/2017


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 3896        FILED ON: 4/6/2017

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 3698

By Mrs. Haddad of Somerset, a petition (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Patricia A. Haddad and others relative to the disclosure of customer proprietary information by internet service providers.  Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninetieth General Court
(2017-2018)

_______________

 

An Act relative to internet privacy.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

Chapter 93 of the General Laws is hereby amended by adding the following section:-

Section 115. (a) As used in this section, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following meanings:-

“Customer”, a current or former subscriber to an internet service in the commonwealth or an applicant for an internet service in the commonwealth.

“Opt-in approval”, the method for obtaining customer consent to collect, use, disclose, or permit access to sensitive customer proprietary information. This approval method requires that the provider obtain from the customer affirmative, express consent allowing the requested collection, usage, disclosure, or access to the sensitive customer proprietary information after the customer is provided appropriate notification of the provider’s request.

“Sensitive customer proprietary information”, financial information, health information, information pertaining to children, Social Security numbers, precise geo-location information, content of communications, call detail information, and web browsing history, application usage history, and the functional equivalents of either.

(b) An internet service provider may not collect, use, disclose, or permit access to sensitive customer proprietary information except as described in subsection (c) or with the opt-in approval of a customer as described in subsection (d).

(c) An internet service provider may collect, use, disclose, or permit access to sensitive customer proprietary information without customer approval for the following purposes: (1) in its provision of the internet service from which such information is derived, or in its provision of services necessary to, or used in, the provision of such service; (2) to initiate, render, bill, and collect for internet service; (3) to protect the rights or property of the internet service provider, or to protect users of the internet service and other providers from fraudulent, abusive, or unlawful use of the service; (4) to provide any inbound marketing, referral, or administrative services to the customer for the duration of a real-time interaction, if such interaction was initiated by the customer; (5) to provide location information or other customer proprietary information to: (i) a public safety answering point, emergency medical service provider or emergency dispatch provider, public safety, fire service, or law enforcement official, or hospital emergency or trauma care facility, in order to respond to the user’s request for emergency services; (ii) inform the user’s legal guardian or members of the user’s immediate family of the user’s location in an emergency situation that involves the risk of death or serious physical harm; or (iii) providers of information or database management services solely for purposes of assisting in the delivery of emergency services in response to an emergency; or (6) as otherwise required or authorized by law.

(d) Except as otherwise provided in this section, an internet service provider shall obtain opt-in approval from a customer to: (1) collect, use, disclose, or permit access to any of the customer’s sensitive customer proprietary information; or (2) make any material retroactive change that would result in a use, disclosure, or permission of access to any of the customer’s proprietary information previously collected by the provider for which the customer did not previously grant approval.

(e) An internet service provider shall, at a minimum solicit customer approval pursuant to subsection (d), as applicable, at the point of sale and when making 1 or more material changes to privacy policies. The solicitation of customer approval must be clear and conspicuous, and in language that is comprehensible and not misleading. The solicitation must disclose: (i) the types of sensitive customer proprietary information for which the provider is seeking customer approval to collect, use, disclose, or permit access to; (ii) the purposes for which such sensitive customer proprietary information will be used; and (iii) the categories of entities to which the provider intends to disclose or permit access to such sensitive customer proprietary information. The solicitation of customer approval must be completely translated into a language other than English if the internet service provider transacts business with the customer in that language.

(f) An internet service provider shall make available a simple, easy-to-use mechanism for customers to grant, deny, or withdraw opt-in approval at any time. The mechanism must be clear and conspicuous, in language that is comprehensible and not misleading, and made available at no additional cost to the customer. The mechanism must be persistently available on or through the provider’s website; the provider’s application, if it provides an application for account management purposes; and any functional equivalent to the provider’s homepage or application. If a provider does not have a website, the provider shall provide a persistently available mechanism by another means, including, but not limited to, a toll-free telephone number. The customer’s grant, denial, or withdrawal of approval must be given effect promptly and remain in effect until the customer revokes or limits such grant, denial, or withdrawal of approval.