HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1584 FILED ON: 1/19/2017
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 845
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Paul R. Heroux
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act prohibiting discrimination against adults with disabilities in family and juvenile court proceedings.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: | Date Added: |
Paul R. Heroux | 2nd Bristol | 1/19/2017 |
Ruth B. Balser | 12th Middlesex | 2/2/2017 |
Michael J. Barrett | Third Middlesex | 1/26/2017 |
Paul Brodeur | 32nd Middlesex | 2/1/2017 |
Thomas J. Calter | 12th Plymouth | 2/2/2017 |
James M. Cantwell | 4th Plymouth | 2/3/2017 |
Tackey Chan | 2nd Norfolk | 2/3/2017 |
Brendan P. Crighton | Third Essex | 2/2/2017 |
Marjorie C. Decker | 25th Middlesex | 2/3/2017 |
Sal N. DiDomenico | Middlesex and Suffolk | 2/3/2017 |
James J. Dwyer | 30th Middlesex | 1/31/2017 |
Jennifer L. Flanagan | Worcester and Middlesex | 2/1/2017 |
Sean Garballey | 23rd Middlesex | 2/3/2017 |
Anne M. Gobi | Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire and Middlesex | 2/3/2017 |
Carlos González | 10th Hampden | 2/3/2017 |
Jonathan Hecht | 29th Middlesex | 2/3/2017 |
Natalie Higgins | 4th Worcester | 2/3/2017 |
Mary S. Keefe | 15th Worcester | 2/3/2017 |
Kay Khan | 11th Middlesex | 1/27/2017 |
Kevin J. Kuros | 8th Worcester | 2/3/2017 |
Jack Lewis | 7th Middlesex | 2/1/2017 |
Jason M. Lewis | Fifth Middlesex | 1/31/2017 |
Joseph W. McGonagle, Jr. | 28th Middlesex | 2/2/2017 |
Paul McMurtry | 11th Norfolk | 2/3/2017 |
James M. Murphy | 4th Norfolk | 2/2/2017 |
James J. O'Day | 14th Worcester | 2/1/2017 |
Denise Provost | 27th Middlesex | 2/3/2017 |
Todd M. Smola | 1st Hampden | 2/3/2017 |
Thomas M. Stanley | 9th Middlesex | 2/2/2017 |
Paul Tucker | 7th Essex | 2/2/2017 |
Steven Ultrino | 33rd Middlesex | 1/26/2017 |
Aaron Vega | 5th Hampden | 2/2/2017 |
Chris Walsh | 6th Middlesex | 2/2/2017 |
Thomas P. Walsh | 12th Essex | 2/3/2017 |
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1584 FILED ON: 1/19/2017
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 845
By Mr. Heroux of Attleboro, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 845) of Paul R. Heroux and others relative to prohibiting discrimination against adults with disabilities in family and juvenile court proceedings. The Judiciary. |
[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 1370 OF 2015-2016.]
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninetieth General Court
(2017-2018)
_______________
An Act prohibiting discrimination against adults with disabilities in family and juvenile court proceedings.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 208 of the General Laws is hereby further amended by inserting after section 31A the following section:-
Section 31B. For the purposes of this chapter the following words shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:-
“Adaptive parenting equipment”, includes any piece of equipment or any item that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the parenting capabilities of a parent with a disability.
“Disability”, a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of an individual, a record of such impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment. This definition shall be broadly interpreted, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008.
“Supportive parenting services”, services that help parents with a disability compensate for those aspects of the disability that affect their ability to care for their children and that will enable them to discharge their parental responsibilities. The term includes, but is not limited to, specialized or adapted training, evaluations, and assistance with effective use of adaptive equipment, as well as accommodations that allow a parent with a disability to benefit from other services, such as braille text or sign language interpreters.
Nothing in this chapter shall allow a parent’s disability to be considered a negative factor in a determination of custody of or visitation with a minor child, absent a specific showing by a preponderance of the evidence made by the party raising the allegation, that there is a nexus between the parent’s disability and alleged harm to the child, and that this alleged harm cannot be prevented or alleviated by accommodations for the disability, including adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services.
If the court considers a parent’s disability as a negative factor in an award of custody of and or visitation with a child, the court shall make specific written findings as to the nexus between the parent’s disability and harm to the child, what effect, if any, said harm has on the best interests of the child, and whether or not adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services can alleviate said harm.
SECTION 2. Chapter 209C of the General Laws is hereby further amended by inserting after section 10 the following section:-
Section 10A. For the purposes of this chapter the following words shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:-
“Adaptive parenting equipment”, includes any piece of equipment or any item that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the parenting capabilities of a parent with a disability.
“Disability”, a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of an individual, a record of such impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment. This definition shall be broadly interpreted, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008.
“Supportive parenting services”, services that help parents with a disability compensate for those aspects of the disability that affect their ability to care for their children and that will enable them to discharge their parental responsibilities. The term includes, but is not limited to, specialized or adapted training, evaluations, and assistance with effective use of adaptive equipment, as well as accommodations that allow a parent with a disability to benefit from other services, such as braille text or sign language interpreters.
Nothing in this chapter shall allow a parent’s disability to be considered a negative factor in a determination of custody of or visitation with a minor child, absent a specific showing by a preponderance of the evidence made by the party raising the allegation, that there is a nexus between the parent’s disability and alleged harm to the child, and that this alleged harm cannot be prevented or alleviated by accommodations for the disability, including adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services.
If the court considers a parent’s disability as a negative factor in an award of custody of and or visitation with a child, the court shall make specific written findings as to the nexus between the parent’s disability and harm to the child, what effect, if any, said harm has on the best interests of the child, and whether or not adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services can alleviate said harm.
SECTION 3. Section 21 of said chapter 119, as appearing in the 2010 Official Edition, is hereby further amended by inserting after the second paragraph the following paragraph:-
“Adaptive parenting equipment”, includes any piece of equipment or any item that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the parenting capabilities of a parent with a disability.
SECTION 4. Section 21 of said chapter 119, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by inserting after the eleventh paragraph the following paragraph:-
“Disability”, a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of an individual, a record of such impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment. This definition shall be broadly interpreted, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008.
SECTION 5. Section 21 of said chapter 119, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by inserting after the twenty second paragraph the following paragraph:-
“Supportive parenting services”, services that help parents with a disability compensate for those aspects of the disability that affect their ability to care for their children and that will enable them to discharge their parental responsibilities. The term includes, but is not limited to, specialized or adapted training, evaluations, and assistance with effective use of adaptive equipment, as well as accommodations that allow a parent with a disability to benefit from other services, such as braille text or sign language interpreters.”
SECTION 6. Chapter 119 of the General Laws is hereby further amended by inserting after section 24 the following section:-
Section 24A. Nothing in this chapter shall allow a parent’s disability, as defined in section 21 of this chapter, to be considered a negative factor in a determination whether a child is in need of care and protection or for the removal of custody of a child from a parent, guardian, or other custodian, absent a specific showing by clear and convincing evidence made by the Department, that there is a nexus between the parent’s disability and alleged harm to the child, and that this alleged harm cannot be prevented or alleviated by accommodations for the disability, including adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services.
If the court considers a parent’s disability as a negative factor in determining that a child is in need of care and protection or for the removal of custody of a child from a parent, guardian, or other custodian, the court shall make specific written findings as to the nexus between the parent’s disability and harm to the child, the impact this has on current parental fitness, and whether or not adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services can alleviate said harm or render the parent fit.
SECTION 7. Section 3 of chapter 210 is hereby further amended by striking out subsection (c)(xii), as appearing in the 2010 Official Edition, and inserting in place thereof the following subsection:-
Section 3 (c)(xii). a failure of a parent to discharge parental responsibilities, that is reasonably likely to continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period, and that results in harm to the child, and cannot be alleviated by adequate accommodations, including adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services.
SECTION 8. Chapter 210 of the General Laws is hereby further amended by inserting after section 3B the following section:-
Section 3C. For the purposes of this chapter the following words shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:-
“Adaptive parenting equipment”, includes any piece of equipment or any item that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the parenting capabilities of a parent with a disability.
“Disability”, a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of an individual, a record of such impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment. This definition shall be broadly interpreted, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008.
“Supportive parenting services”, services that help parents with a disability compensate for those aspects of the disability that affect their ability to care for their children and that will enable them to discharge their parental responsibilities. The term includes, but is not limited to, specialized or adapted training, evaluations, and assistance with effective use of adaptive equipment, as well as accommodations that allow a parent with a disability to benefit from other services, such as braille text or sign language interpreters.
Nothing in this chapter shall allow a parent’s disability to be considered a negative factor in determining whether to terminate parental rights, absent a specific showing by clear and convincing evidence made by the Department, that there is a nexus between the parent’s disability and alleged harm to the child, and that this alleged harm cannot be prevented or alleviated by accommodations for the disability, including adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services.
If the court considers a parent’s disability as a negative factor in determining whether to terminate parental rights, the court shall make specific written findings as to the nexus between the parent’s disability and harm to the child, the impact this has on current parental fitness, and whether or not adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services can alleviate said harm or render the parent fit.
SECTION 9. Section 5-101 of said chapter 190B, as appearing in the 2010 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting before the first paragraph the following paragraph:-
“Adaptive parenting equipment”, includes any piece of equipment or any item that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the parenting capabilities of a parent with a disability.
SECTION 10. Section 5-101 of said chapter 190B, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out the fourth paragraph and inserting in place thereof the following paragraph:-
“Disability”, a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of an individual, a record of such impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment. This definition shall be broadly interpreted, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008.
SECTION 11. Section 5-101 of said chapter 190B, as so appearing, is hereby amended by inserting after the twenty fourth paragraph the following paragraph:-
“Supportive parenting services”, services that help parents with a disability compensate for those aspects of the disability that affect their ability to care for their children and that will enable them to discharge their parental responsibilities. The term includes, but is not limited to, specialized or adapted training, evaluations, and assistance with effective use of adaptive equipment, as well as accommodations that allow a parent with a disability to benefit from other services, such as braille text or sign language interpreters.
SECTION 12. Chapter 190B of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting after section
5-204 the following section:-
Section 5-204A. Nothing in this chapter shall allow a parent’s disability to be considered a negative factor in determining whether to appointment a temporary or permanent guardian for a minor child, absent a specific showing by a clear and convincing evidence made by the party raising the allegation, that there is a nexus between the parent’s disability and alleged harm to the child, and that this alleged harm cannot be prevented or alleviated by accommodations for the disability, including adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services.
If the court considers a parent’s disability as a negative factor in a determination whether to appoint a temporary or permanent guardian for a minor child, the court shall make specific written findings as to the nexus between the parent’s disability and harm to the child, the impact this has on current parental fitness, and whether or not adaptive parenting equipment or supportive parenting services can alleviate said harm or render the parent fit.