SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1498        FILED ON: 1/20/2017

SENATE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 294

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Barbara A. L'Italien

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act relative to students with dyslexia.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

 

Barbara A. L'Italien

Second Essex and Middlesex

 

Linda Dorcena Forry

First Suffolk

 

James B. Eldridge

Middlesex and Worcester

 

Joan B.  Lovely

Second Essex

 

Jason M. Lewis

Fifth Middlesex

1/25/2017

Josh S. Cutler

6th Plymouth

1/25/2017

Cory Atkins

14th Middlesex

1/25/2017

Tackey Chan

2nd Norfolk

1/27/2017

James M. Cantwell

4th Plymouth

1/30/2017

Thomas P. Walsh

12th Essex

1/30/2017

Bruce J. Ayers

1st Norfolk

1/30/2017

James R. Miceli

19th Middlesex

1/31/2017

Solomon Goldstein-Rose

3rd Hampshire

1/31/2017

Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr.

12th Hampden

1/31/2017

Todd M. Smola

1st Hampden

1/31/2017

Angelo M. Scaccia

14th Suffolk

1/31/2017

Kenneth I. Gordon

21st Middlesex

2/1/2017

John F. Keenan

Norfolk and Plymouth

2/1/2017

David K. Muradian, Jr.

9th Worcester

2/1/2017

Marjorie C. Decker

25th Middlesex

2/1/2017

Joseph W. McGonagle, Jr.

28th Middlesex

2/1/2017

Ryan C. Fattman

Worcester and Norfolk

2/1/2017

Sal N. DiDomenico

Middlesex and Suffolk

2/2/2017

Patrick M. O'Connor

Plymouth and Norfolk

2/2/2017

Thomas J. Calter

12th Plymouth

2/2/2017

Paul R. Heroux

2nd Bristol

2/2/2017

Brian Murray

10th Worcester

2/2/2017

John W. Scibak

2nd Hampshire

2/2/2017

Michael O. Moore

Second Worcester

2/2/2017

Juana B. Matias

16th Essex

2/2/2017

Mike Connolly

26th Middlesex

2/2/2017

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex

2/3/2017

Thomas M. Stanley

9th Middlesex

2/3/2017

Paul Brodeur

32nd Middlesex

2/3/2017

Paul Tucker

7th Essex

2/3/2017

Jennifer L. Flanagan

Worcester and Middlesex

2/3/2017

Jack Lewis

7th Middlesex

2/3/2017

John J. Lawn, Jr.

10th Middlesex

2/3/2017

James Arciero

2nd Middlesex

2/3/2017

Hannah Kane

11th Worcester

2/3/2017

William N. Brownsberger

Second Suffolk and Middlesex

2/3/2017

Adam G. Hinds

Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin and Hampden

2/3/2017

Julian Cyr

Cape and Islands

2/3/2017

Michael J. Barrett

Third Middlesex

9/20/2017


SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1498        FILED ON: 1/20/2017

SENATE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 294

By Ms. L'Italien, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 294) of Barbara A. L'Italien, Linda Dorcena Forry, James B. Eldridge, Joan B. Lovely and other members of the General Court for legislation to address the special education needs of children with dyslexia.  Education.

 

[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE SENATE, NO. 312 OF 2015-2016.]

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninetieth General Court
(2017-2018)

_______________

 

An Act relative to students with dyslexia.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

Whereas, the term dyslexia is undefined in the Massachusetts General Laws;

Whereas the lack of specificity in diagnosing dyslexia is causing an impediment to effective intervention resulting in an  average time between identification of risk factors for dyslexia and reading at-grade-level of more than two years;

Whereas many students who receive appropriate intervention and instruction can make the necessary progress to read at grade level;

Therefore, it is essential to implement early screening and intervention for students for Dyslexia.

SECTION 1: Section 1 of Chapter 71B of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting, after the second paragraph, the following paragraph:-

“Dyslexia” shall have the same meaning as the most recent definition by the National Institute of Health.

SECTION 2: Section 38G1/2 of Chapter 71 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting, after the fourth paragraph, the following paragraph:-

“Dyslexia” shall have the same meaning as the most recent definition by the National Institute of Health.

SECTION 3: Chapter 70 of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting the following new section:-

Section 97.  Dyslexia Screening

“The department of elementary and secondary education shall develop guidelines for the screening of all students, before the end of Kindergarten, for the identification of characteristics that are associated with risk factors for dyslexia, as defined by the National Institute of Health.  Such screening shall be completed using evidence-based testing methodologies and shall include tests to identify deficits in phonemic awareness, rapid automatized naming, and letter sound knowledge.  Students identified as having characteristics associated with risk factors for dyslexia pursuant to this section shall be referred for evaluation for special education services pursuant to Section xxx of Chapter 71B.”

SECTION 4: Section 38G of Chapter 71 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting, in line 266 after the word “disabilities,” the following words:-

including dyslexia,

SECTION 5: Said section 38G1/2 of said Chapter 71, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by adding the following paragraph:-

The board shall provide an endorsement in dyslexia which shall include both coursework and field experience for licensed general and special education teachers to acquire the competencies necessary to use the scientifically based reading research and evidenced based practices to instructing and remediating students with dyslexia, develop appropriate IEP programs, enable students with dyslexia to effectively access grade-level curriculum, and consult and collaborate with other educators in order to meet the unique and complex educational needs of students with dyslexia. All content taught as part of this specialization shall be consistent with the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., for evidence based practices, and 20 U.S.C. §6368(3) for scientifically based reading research. The requirements for the endorsement in dyslexia, as promulgated by the board, may also be used to satisfy course requirements necessary to obtain a professional license. The board shall promulgate regulations specifying the subject matter knowledge, skills and competencies required for such endorsement, including requirements to incorporate renewal of the endorsement as part of the individual professional development plan required pursuant to section 38G. Said regulations shall also specify components necessary for preparation programs offering an endorsement in dyslexia, which shall be included in the department’s process for approving preparation programs.

SECTION 6: Section 3 of said Chapter 71B, as so appearing, is hereby amended by inserting, at the end of paragraph 8, the following words:

Whenever an evaluation indicates that a child has dyslexia, as defined by the National Institute of Health , the Individualized Education Program (IEP) team, as defined by regulations of the department, shall consider and specifically address the following: access to evidence-based, sequenced, explicit multisensory reading instruction; access to assistive technology; access to teachers and teaching assistants who have obtained the dyslexia endorsement pursuant to Section 38G1/2 of Chapter 71 of the General Laws; and effective access to grade-level curriculum.