SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1115 FILED ON: 1/19/2017
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 660
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Michael J. Rodrigues
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act relative to health care non-discrimination.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: |
|
Michael J. Rodrigues | First Bristol and Plymouth |
|
Michael F. Rush | Norfolk and Suffolk | 1/20/2017 |
Michael D. Brady | Second Plymouth and Bristol | 1/30/2017 |
SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1115 FILED ON: 1/19/2017
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 660
By Mr. Rodrigues, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 660) of Michael J. Rodrigues, Michael F. Rush and Michael D. Brady for legislation relative to health care non-discrimination. Health Care Financing. |
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninetieth General Court
(2017-2018)
_______________
An Act relative to health care non-discrimination.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 176O of the General Laws is amended by adding the following Section.
Section 28. (a) When establishing alternative payment arrangements, a carrier may take into account patient population characteristics including age, acuity, social determinants of health, and behavioral health service needs. The measures of total medical expense used to establish an alternative payment arrangement should include expenses incurred by all providers in the carrier’s provider network, uniformly applied by provider type. When establishing alternative payment arrangements, a carrier shall not take into account provider prices or historic medical spending attributable only to a subset of its provider network or the historic medical expenses of members based on their attribution to specific providers in the carrier’s network.
(b) In addition to the factors set forth in subsection (a) of this section, an alternative payment arrangement may include adjustments for claims processing and administrative costs and incentive payments based on attainment of quality measures or outcomes, as negotiated between a carrier and providers participating in the alternative payment arrangement.
(c) Each carrier shall file with the center for health information and analysis data on its alternative payment arrangements sufficient for the verification of compliance with subsection (a) of this section, in a form determined by the center for health information and analysis.
(d) A violation of subsection (a) or (c) of this section shall be a violation of chapter 93A of the general laws.
SECTION 2. Chapter 176O is amended by adding the following definition after the definition of adverse determination:
“Alternative payment arrangement” means a contract between a carrier and a health care provider or group of providers under which payment is made by capitation, shared savings, reconcilation of fee-for-service payments against a global budget or per-member-per month target, or any other method that bases payments to the provider on a projection of the medical expenses to be incurred by a population of individuals.