HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 617        FILED ON: 1/11/2019

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1933

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Hannah Kane

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act to improve patient access to cancer clinical trial programs.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Hannah Kane

11th Worcester

1/11/2019

Brian M. Ashe

2nd Hampden

1/14/2019

Kimberly N. Ferguson

1st Worcester

1/24/2019

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

1/26/2019

Colleen M. Garry

36th Middlesex

1/18/2019

Susan Williams Gifford

2nd Plymouth

1/17/2019

Anne M. Gobi

Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire and Middlesex

1/24/2019

Sheila C. Harrington

1st Middlesex

1/30/2019

James K. Hawkins

2nd Bristol

1/16/2019

Stephan Hay

3rd Worcester

1/24/2019

Randy Hunt

5th Barnstable

1/22/2019

Jason M. Lewis

Fifth Middlesex

1/23/2019

Joseph D. McKenna

18th Worcester

1/29/2019

Paul McMurtry

11th Norfolk

1/30/2019

Michael O. Moore

Second Worcester

1/24/2019

Michael J. Soter

8th Worcester

1/16/2019

Bruce E. Tarr

First Essex and Middlesex

1/30/2019

Timothy R. Whelan

1st Barnstable

1/22/2019


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 617        FILED ON: 1/11/2019

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1933

By Mrs. Kane of Shrewsbury, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1933) of Hannah Kane and others for legislation to improve patient access to cancer clinical trial programs.  Public Health.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninety-First General Court
(2019-2020)

_______________

 

An Act to improve patient access to cancer clinical trial programs.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Chapter 111 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2016 Official Edition, is hereby amended by adding the following section:-

Section 237. (a) The general court finds and declares that:

(1) A resident of the commonwealth will be diagnosed with cancer approximately every 14 minutes, and every 41 minutes a resident of the commonwealth will die of cancer. African American residents of the commonwealth, in particular, face higher rates of cancer incidence and mortality compared to other races and ethnicities. The commonwealth ranks 45th in the nation for cigarette smoking and 46th in the nation for obesity, two factors that lead to increased risk of cancer.

(2) The ability to translate medical findings from research to practice relies largely on having robust and diverse patient participation in cancer clinical trials. A low participation rate or a homogenous participant group prevents segments of the population from benefitting from advances achieved through clinical research and creates uncertainties over the applicability of research findings.

(3) Diverse patient participation in a clinical trial depends, in part, on whether a participant can afford ancillary costs like transportation, childcare, or lodging during the course of his or her participation. A national study in 2015 found that patient households making less than $50,000 annually were almost 30 percent less likely to participate in clinical trials.

(4) This disparity threatens one of the most basic ethical underpinnings of clinical research, the requirements that the benefits of research be made available equitably among all eligible individuals.

(5) According to the National Cancer Institute, Cancer Clinical Trials Resource Guide, some of the barriers preventing individuals with cancer or at high risk of developing cancer from participating in clinical trials are direct and indirect financial and personal costs, including travel and child care expenses.

(6) While the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently confirmed to Congress that reimbursement of direct patient incurred expenses is not inducement, many organizations, pharmaceutical companies, philanthropic individuals, charitable organizations, government entities, and others still operate under the understanding that such reimbursement could be considered inducement.

(7) It is the intent of the general court to enact legislation that would therefore further define and establish a clear difference between what is considered “inducement” for a patient to participate in a clinical trial and the reimbursement of expenses for participating in a cancer clinical trial.

(8) Therefore, new, additional, and further clarification of the FDA’s confirmation is appropriate and important in order to improve cancer clinical trial participation, which is the primary intent of this legislation.

(b) As used in this section, the following words shall have the following meanings:

“Cancer clinical trials”, research studies that test new cancer treatments on people, including but not limited to medications, chemotherapies, stem cell therapies, and other new treatments.

“Inducement”, paying a person money, including a lump sum or salary payment, to participate in a cancer clinical trial.

“Patient subject”, a person participating in a cancer clinical trial.

(c)(1) Inducement:

(i) All sponsors of cancer clinical trials shall inform potential enrollees at the time of the informed consent process that:

(A) Reimbursement for travel and ancillary costs is available to all enrollees based on financial need;

(B) Reimbursement of travel and ancillary costs is provided to eliminate financial barriers to enrollment in order to retain subjects in the clinical trial; and

(C) Family, friends, or chaperones that attend the cancer clinical trial treatments to support the patient are eligible for reimbursement of their travel and ancillary expenses.

(ii) Reimbursement of these travel and ancillary costs is not considered an inducement to participate in a cancer clinical trial. The reimbursement for travel and ancillary expenses is not considered coercive or exerting undue influence to participate in a trial. It is a means to create parity in clinical trial access and remove a barrier to participation for financially burdened patients.

(2) Government, industry, public and private foundations, corporations, and individuals may offer financial support to cover ancillary costs through their support of third party nonprofit corporations and public charities that seek to increase enrollment, retention, and minority participation in cancer clinical trials.

(3) Reimbursement programs to cover ancillary and travel expenses must be reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) in conjunction with their review of the proposed clinical trial. IRBs and IECs must consider whether the reimbursed patients are recruited fairly, informed adequately, and reimbursed. The nature of the ancillary support and general guidelines on financial eligibility must be disclosed in the informed consent process and the reimbursement process must conform to state and federal laws and guidance.

(d) This act shall take effect in 90 days.