HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2892        FILED ON: 1/17/2019

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 2297

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Daniel J. Hunt

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act relative to municipal police department employees.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Daniel J. Hunt

13th Suffolk

1/17/2019

Larry Calderone

Boston Police Patrolmen's Association

1/17/2019

Boston Police Patrolmen's Association

295 Freeport St, Boston, MA 02122

1/17/2019

Boston Police Detectives Benevolent Society

434 Hyde Park Ave, Roslindale, MA 02131

1/17/2019

Massachusetts Coalition of Police

182 Worcester-Providence Turnpike, Sutton, MA 01590

1/17/2019


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2892        FILED ON: 1/17/2019

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 2297

By Mr. Hunt of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2297) of Daniel J. Hunt and others relative to line-of-duty related mental impairment of municipal police department employees.  Public Service.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninety-First General Court
(2019-2020)

_______________

 

An Act relative to municipal police department employees.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

Section 1: Chapter 41 of the General Laws, as so appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by adding the following new section:-

Section 34: Any employee of a municipal police department who, preceding the date of disablement, had not been previously diagnosed with a mental impairment, is diagnosed with a mental impairment then the mental impairment is presumptively an occupational disease and shall be presumed to have been due to the nature of the employment. This presumption may be rebutted by substantial factors brought by the employer or insurer. Any substantial factors that are used to rebut this presumption and that are known to the employer or insurer at the time of the denial of liability shall be communicated to the employeeon the denial of liability. The mental impairment is not considered an occupational disease if it results from disciplinary action, work evaluation, job transfer, layoff, demotion, promotion, termination, retirement, or similar action taken in good faith by the employer.