HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2000 FILED ON: 1/17/2019
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 2747
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Paul McMurtry
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act allowing an exemption to the prohibition on gifts to public employees.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: | Date Added: |
Paul McMurtry | 11th Norfolk | 1/17/2019 |
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2000 FILED ON: 1/17/2019
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 2747
By Mr. McMurtry of Dedham, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2747) of Paul McMurtry for legislation to further regulate gifts to public employees. State Administration and Regulatory Oversight. |
[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 3630 OF 2017-2018.]
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninety-First General Court
(2019-2020)
_______________
An Act allowing an exemption to the prohibition on gifts to public employees.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Section 3 of chapter 268A of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking out subsection (f) and inserting in place thereof the following subsection:-
(f) The state ethics commission shall adopt regulations: (i) defining ''substantial value,''; provided, however, that ''substantial value'' shall not be less than $50; (ii) establishing exclusions for ceremonial gifts; (iii) establishing exclusions for gifts given solely because of family or friendship; (iv) establishing an one-time exemption within a calendar year for public employees to accept a gift larger than $50, subject to the decision of the state ethics commission pursuant to rules promulgated for permissible one-time exemptions; and (v) establishing additional exclusions for other situations that do not present a genuine risk of a conflict or the appearance of a conflict of interest.