HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 551        FILED ON: 1/11/2019

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 3139

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

William M. Straus

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act relative to unmanned aerial systems.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

William M. Straus

10th Bristol

1/11/2019

Michael F. Rush

Norfolk and Suffolk

1/16/2019

Joseph W. McGonagle, Jr.

28th Middlesex

1/14/2019

Daniel J. Ryan

2nd Suffolk

2/1/2019

Steven S. Howitt

4th Bristol

1/11/2019

Bradley H. Jones, Jr.

20th Middlesex

1/23/2019

Louis L. Kafka

8th Norfolk

1/23/2019

José F. Tosado

9th Hampden

1/16/2019

Steven Ultrino

33rd Middlesex

1/11/2019

Bruce J. Ayers

1st Norfolk

1/14/2019

Carlos González

10th Hampden

1/24/2019

Susan Williams Gifford

2nd Plymouth

1/14/2019

Carmine Lawrence Gentile

13th Middlesex

1/14/2019

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

1/14/2019

Jay D. Livingstone

8th Suffolk

1/14/2019

Paul A. Schmid, III

8th Bristol

1/14/2019

John Barrett, III

1st Berkshire

1/14/2019

Elizabeth A. Poirier

14th Bristol

1/18/2019

Christopher Hendricks

11th Bristol

1/16/2019

Marcos A. Devers

16th Essex

1/24/2019

Norman J. Orrall

12th Bristol

1/15/2019

Brian W. Murray

10th Worcester

1/18/2019

Daniel J. Hunt

13th Suffolk

1/25/2019

Thomas M. Stanley

9th Middlesex

1/31/2019

Nika C. Elugardo

15th Suffolk

1/31/2019

Brian M. Ashe

2nd Hampden

2/1/2019

David Biele

4th Suffolk

2/1/2019

David T. Vieira

3rd Barnstable

2/1/2019


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 551        FILED ON: 1/11/2019

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 3139

By Mr. Straus of Mattapoisett, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3139) of William M. Straus and others relative to drones and other unmanned aerial systems.  Transportation.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninety-First General Court
(2019-2020)

_______________

 

An Act relative to unmanned aerial systems.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Chapter 90 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2016 official edition, is hereby amended by adding the following section:-

“Section 63(a). As used in this section the following terms shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following meanings:-

“Operate”, to pilot, fly, control, direct, or program the flight of an unmanned aircraft system.

“Unmanned Aircraft System” or “UAS”, an unmanned aerial vehicle and associated elements and support equipment required for the safe and efficient operation of the UAV, including but not limited to, communications links and components that control the UAV.

“Unmanned Aerial Vehicle”, “UAV”, or “drone”, a powered aerial vehicle that:

(a)Does not carry a human operator and is operated without the possibility of direct human intervention from within or on the aircraft;

(b)Uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle lift;

(c)Can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely;

(d)Can be expendable or recoverable; and

(e)Weighs more than 0.55lbs. and less than 55lbs.

(b) No municipality shall enact or enforce any ordinance regulating the operation of UAVs and UASs except as otherwise authorized by regulation or guideline promulgated by the Federal Aviation Administration or the laws of this commonwealth.

(c) (1) No person shall equip or operate a UAS or UAV armed with a weapon capable of causing serious bodily injury or death or is otherwise capable of firing or releasing a projectile designed to cause serious bodily injury or death. Persons convicted of unauthorized operation of a UAS or UAV under this paragraph shall be punished by a fine of not more than two-thousand dollars or by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than one year or both.

(2) No person shall operate a UAS or UAV in a manner so as to interfere with or disrupt the flight of manned aircraft, or otherwise impede the normal course of operations of any international, regional, municipal, or general aviation airport. Persons convicted of unauthorized operation of a UAS or UAV under this paragraph shall be punished by a fine of not more than one-thousand five-hundred dollars or by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than one year or both. Unauthorized operation of a UAS or UAV under this paragraph which results in damage to a manned aircraft in flight or causes said aircraft to crash shall be punished by a fine of not more than ten-thousand dollars or by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or both.

(3) No person shall knowingly or intentionally operate a UAS or UAV so as to interfere with or impede first responders or law enforcement actively responding to an emergency. Persons convicted of unauthorized operation of a UAS or UAV under this paragraph shall be punished by a fine of not more than one-thousand dollars, or by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than six months, or both.

(d) No person shall operate a UAS or UAV for the purpose of conducting surveillance or observation of an individual, their private real property, or dwelling inclusive of the curtilage without said individual’s consent. Improper use of a UAS or UAV under this paragraph shall be deemed a violation of section 1B of chapter 214 of the General Laws. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, use of UASs or UAVs by law enforcement for observational or surveillance purposes is permitted:

(i) if the law enforcement agency first obtains a search warrant authorizing the use of a UAS or UAV;

(ii) to counter the risk of a terrorist incident if the United States Secretary for Homeland Security or the Secretary of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security determines credible intelligence exists indicating the risk of a terrorist incident; or

(iii) if the law enforcement agency possesses reasonable suspicion under the circumstances that use of a UAS or UAV is necessary to prevent imminent danger to life, to conduct a pursuit of an escapee or suspect, or to facilitate a search for a missing person.

(e)(1) Notwithstanding any general or special law or regulation to the contrary, a law enforcement agency in possession of images, footage, data, or recordings captured from the use of a UAS or UAV shall permanently erase or destroy or cause to be destroyed all images, footage, data, or recordings captured from a UAS or UAV not later than 120 days following the date on which the images, footage, data, or recordings were captured.

(2) The law enforcement agency may retain said UAS or UAV images, footage, data, or recordings beyond 120 days if such information contains evidence of a crime or is relevant to an ongoing investigation or judicial proceeding.

(f) If any part of this section is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, preempted, or invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this section.