HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1240 FILED ON: 1/16/2019
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 3146
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
William M. Straus
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act relative to transportation infrastructure value capture.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: | Date Added: |
William M. Straus | 10th Bristol | 1/16/2019 |
Joseph W. McGonagle, Jr. | 28th Middlesex | 1/29/2019 |
Adrian C. Madaro | 1st Suffolk | 1/29/2019 |
Mike Connolly | 26th Middlesex | 1/25/2019 |
William N. Brownsberger | Second Suffolk and Middlesex | 1/25/2019 |
Steven Ultrino | 33rd Middlesex | 1/28/2019 |
Christine P. Barber | 34th Middlesex | 1/29/2019 |
David M. Rogers | 24th Middlesex | 1/29/2019 |
Jennifer E. Benson | 37th Middlesex | 1/29/2019 |
Norman J. Orrall | 12th Bristol | 1/30/2019 |
Susan Williams Gifford | 2nd Plymouth | 1/30/2019 |
Antonio F. D. Cabral | 13th Bristol | 1/30/2019 |
Kevin G. Honan | 17th Suffolk | 1/30/2019 |
Paul McMurtry | 11th Norfolk | 1/30/2019 |
Carmine Lawrence Gentile | 13th Middlesex | 1/30/2019 |
Tommy Vitolo | 15th Norfolk | 1/31/2019 |
Harold P. Naughton, Jr. | 12th Worcester | 2/1/2019 |
David Henry Argosky LeBoeuf | 17th Worcester | 2/1/2019 |
Jonathan Hecht | 29th Middlesex | 2/1/2019 |
Kate Hogan | 3rd Middlesex | 2/1/2019 |
Linda Dean Campbell | 15th Essex | 2/1/2019 |
Liz Miranda | 5th Suffolk | 2/1/2019 |
Maria Duaime Robinson | 6th Middlesex | 2/1/2019 |
Thomas M. Stanley | 9th Middlesex | 2/1/2019 |
James B. Eldridge | Middlesex and Worcester | 2/1/2019 |
Elizabeth A. Malia | 11th Suffolk | 2/1/2019 |
Jack Patrick Lewis | 7th Middlesex | 2/1/2019 |
Michelle L. Ciccolo | 15th Middlesex | 2/1/2019 |
Kay Khan | 11th Middlesex | 2/1/2019 |
David Biele | 4th Suffolk | 2/1/2019 |
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1240 FILED ON: 1/16/2019
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 3146
By Mr. Straus of Mattapoisett, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3146) of William M. Straus and others relative to supplemental infrastructure financing for transportation. Transportation. |
[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 1893 OF 2017-2018.]
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninety-First General Court
(2019-2020)
_______________
An Act relative to transportation infrastructure value capture.
Whereas, The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purpose, which is to provide supplemental infrastructure financing for transportation, therefore it is hereby declared to be an emergency law, necessary for the immediate preservation of the public convenience.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. The General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, are hereby amended by inserting after chapter 40W, the following new chapter:-
Chapter 40X. Supplemental Infrastructure Financing for Transportation.
Section 1. As used in this chapter, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following meanings:-
“Base date”, the last assessment date of the real property tax immediately preceding the creation of the SIFT district, or any other assessment date designated as the base date in a SIFT agreement.
“Department”, the Massachusetts Department of Transportation.
“Financial plan”, a statement of the costs and sources of revenue required to complete construction of the transportation project, which shall include: (1) cost estimates; (2) the projected amount of indebtedness to be incurred by the municipality, the department the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, or a regional transit authority; and (3) any other sources of anticipated capital, including but not limited to any federal funding.
“Original assessed value”, the aggregate assessed value of all properties within the SIFT district as of the base date.
“Secretary”, the secretary of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation.
“SIFT agreement”, an agreement for supplemental infrastructure financing for transportation entered into by the secretary and a municipality and approved by the municipality in accordance with section 2 authorizing a municipality to collect and remit tax increment revenue in accordance with this chapter.
“SIFT district”, a specified area within the corporate limits of a municipality as set forth in the SIFT agreement.
“Tax increment”, all annual increases in the municipality’s limit on total taxes assessed under section 21C(f) of chapter 59 that are attributable to parcels within the district for fiscal years with an assessment date later than the base date. The tax increment shall also include the part of increases in the limit on total taxes assessed allowed under subsection (f) of section 21C of chapter 59 that are attributable to such increases under said subsection in prior years that were part of the increment in such prior years. In any year in which the limit on total taxes assessed under section 21C is lower than the prior year’s limit on total taxes assessed, the tax increment shall be reduced in the same proportion as the limit on total taxes assessed.
“Transportation project”, any construction project, or any component thereof, undertaken by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, a regional transit authority or department, including without limitation construction, reconstruction, repair or enhancement of ways or bridges, on-ramps or off-ramps, bikeways or multi-use paths, transit stations, passenger facilities, and rail projects and extensions.
Section 2. (a) The secretary and a municipality may enter into a SIFT agreement; provided, that no municipality may enter into or implement a SIFT agreement unless and until the SIFT agreement has been approved by the municipality in accordance with this section. A SIFT agreement shall include without limitation: (1) a detailed description of the transportation project to be financed in whole or in part by the SIFT agreement, including a financial plan for such project; (2) the boundaries of the SIFT district, including a depiction of the SIFT district on a map of the municipality and a listing of the street addresses and lot numbers of all lots within the SIFT district; (3) estimates of the amount of tax increment revenue to be remitted during the term of the SIFT agreement; (4) the method of calculating the percentage of the tax increment to be remitted together with any provisions for adjustment of the method of calculation; (5) the board or officer of the city or town responsible for calculating the tax increment; (6) any tax increment pledged or otherwise subject to chapter 40Q or section 59 of chapter 40; (7) a statement of the estimated impact of tax increment financing on all taxing jurisdictions in which the SIFT district is located; (8) the term of years of the SIFT agreement; (9) the base date; (10) the date, if any, following which the SIFT agreement must be re-approved by the city or town in accordance with section 2 if a notice to proceed has not been issued by the department or authority with respect to the transportation project; (11) anticipated or known gifts, grants, or private contributions; and (12) the department or authority fund to which the tax increment revenue shall be remitted.
(b) Notwithstanding any general or special law or regulation to the contrary, not less than 30 days prior to any vote required under subsection (c), a municipality shall hold a public hearing regarding the SIFT agreement or amendment thereto and shall provide the public with an opportunity to submit written comments. The municipality shall create a written record of the public hearing, which shall include a description of the testimony offered by persons at such hearing. Not less than 14 days prior to the hearing: (1) public notice of the hearing shall be published in one or more local newspapers of general circulation and shall be posted in the municipality’s main governmental building and on the municipality’s web site; and (2) the SIFT agreement or amendment shall be made available by the municipality for inspection and copying.
(c) Notwithstanding any general or special law or regulation to the contrary, a municipality shall approve the SIFT agreement by vote of its town meeting, town council or city council, with the approval of the mayor where required by law; provided, that the term of years, any provision related to calculation of the tax increment, or the boundaries of a SIFT district may only be amended, following approval by the secretary, after meeting the requirements for adoption under this section.
Section 3. (a) Within 60 days following approval of a SIFT agreement in accordance with section 2, the assessor of the city or town shall certify the original assessed value of the taxable property within the boundaries of the SIFT district. Each year after the approval of a SIFT agreement the assessor of the municipality shall certify the amount by which the assessed value has increased or decreased from the original value.
(b) Following approval of a SIFT agreement in accordance with section 2, the municipality shall set aside and remit all tax increment revenues in accordance with the SIFT agreement.
Section 4. The department shall promulgate rules and regulations necessary to implement this chapter, including, without limitation, rules and regulations establishing criteria for evaluating eligible transportation projects.