SENATE DOCKET, NO. 2883 FILED ON: 3/20/2020
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 2652
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Bruce E. Tarr
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act relative to preventing price gouging during an emergency.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: |
|
Bruce E. Tarr | First Essex and Middlesex |
|
Anne M. Gobi | Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire and Middlesex |
|
Patrick M. O'Connor | Plymouth and Norfolk |
|
Brendan P. Crighton | Third Essex | 3/23/2020 |
Diana DiZoglio | First Essex | 4/27/2020 |
Susan Williams Gifford | 2nd Plymouth | 4/27/2020 |
Ann-Margaret Ferrante | 5th Essex | 4/27/2020 |
Michael O. Moore | Second Worcester | 4/27/2020 |
RoseLee Vincent | 16th Suffolk | 4/27/2020 |
Cynthia Stone Creem | First Middlesex and Norfolk | 4/27/2020 |
James M. Kelcourse | 1st Essex | 4/27/2020 |
Tram T. Nguyen | 18th Essex | 4/27/2020 |
James T. Welch | Hampden | 4/28/2020 |
Walter F. Timilty | Norfolk, Bristol and Plymouth | 4/29/2020 |
Marc R. Pacheco | First Plymouth and Bristol | 5/4/2020 |
Mark C. Montigny | Second Bristol and Plymouth | 5/13/2020 |
David Allen Robertson | 19th Middlesex | 5/21/2020 |
SENATE DOCKET, NO. 2883 FILED ON: 3/20/2020
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 2652
By Mr. Tarr, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2652) (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Bruce E. Tarr, Anne M. Gobi, Patrick M. O'Connor, Brendan P. Crighton and other members of the General Court for legislation relative to preventing price gouging during an emergency. Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure. |
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninety-First General Court
(2019-2020)
_______________
An Act relative to preventing price gouging during an emergency.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 93A as appearing in the 2018 official edition is hereby amended by inserting after SECTION 11 at the end thereof the following new section 12:-
SECTION 12. (1) It shall be an unfair or deceptive act or practice, during any market emergency, or any declared statewide emergency, for any petroleum-related business to sell or offer to sell any petroleum product for an amount that represents an unconscionably high price.
(2) A price is unconscionably high if: (a) the amount charged represents a gross disparity between the price of the petroleum product and 1. the price at which the same product was sold or offered for sale by the petroleum-related business in the usual course of business immediately prior to the onset of the market emergency, or 2. the price at which the same or similar petroleum product is readily obtainable by other buyers in the trade area; and
(b) the disparity is not substantially attributable to increased prices charged by the petroleum-related business suppliers or increased costs due to an abnormal market disruption.
(3). It shall be an unfair or deceptive act or practice, during any declared statewide or national emergency, for any business at any point in the chain of distribution or manufacture to sell or offer to sell to any consumer or to any other business any goods or services necessary for the health, safety or welfare of the public for an amount that represents an unconscionably high price.
(4) A price is unconscionably high for the purposes of paragraph 3 of this section provided the following:
(a) there is gross disparity between the price charged or offered; and
1. the price at which the same good or service was sold or offered for sale by the business in the usual course of business immediately prior to the onset of the declared statewide or national emergency; or
2. the price at which the same or similar product is readily obtainable from other businesses; and
(b) the disparity is not substantially attributable to increased prices charged by the business’s suppliers or increased costs due to an abnormal market disruption.