HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1165        FILED ON: 2/2/2021

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 2418

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Ruth B. Balser and Liz Miranda

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act to protect the civil rights and safety of all Massachusetts residents.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Ruth B. Balser

12th Middlesex

2/1/2021

Liz Miranda

5th Suffolk

2/2/2021

James B. Eldridge

Middlesex and Worcester

2/2/2021

Christina A. Minicucci

14th Essex

2/2/2021

Jack Patrick Lewis

7th Middlesex

2/2/2021

Tram T. Nguyen

18th Essex

2/2/2021

Steven C. Owens

29th Middlesex

2/2/2021

Mike Connolly

26th Middlesex

2/2/2021

Lindsay N. Sabadosa

1st Hampshire

2/2/2021

Danillo A. Sena

37th Middlesex

2/2/2021

Patricia A. Duffy

5th Hampden

2/2/2021

Peter Capano

11th Essex

2/2/2021

Frank A. Moran

17th Essex

2/2/2021

Natalie M. Blais

1st Franklin

2/3/2021

Steven Ultrino

33rd Middlesex

2/3/2021

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex

2/3/2021

Mindy Domb

3rd Hampshire

2/3/2021

Tommy Vitolo

15th Norfolk

2/3/2021

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

2/3/2021

Carolyn C. Dykema

8th Middlesex

2/3/2021

Thomas M. Stanley

9th Middlesex

2/3/2021

Tami L. Gouveia

14th Middlesex

2/3/2021

Adrian C. Madaro

1st Suffolk

2/3/2021

Sal N. DiDomenico

Middlesex and Suffolk

2/5/2021

Carmine Lawrence Gentile

13th Middlesex

2/5/2021

Jay D. Livingstone

8th Suffolk

2/5/2021

Michelle L. Ciccolo

15th Middlesex

2/5/2021

Antonio F. D. Cabral

13th Bristol

2/5/2021

Joseph A. Boncore

First Suffolk and Middlesex

2/5/2021

Dylan A. Fernandes

Barnstable, Dukes and Nantucket

2/5/2021

John J. Lawn, Jr.

10th Middlesex

2/8/2021

Jon Santiago

9th Suffolk

2/8/2021

Vanna Howard

17th Middlesex

2/8/2021

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

2/9/2021

Daniel R. Carey

2nd Hampshire

2/9/2021

Maria Duaime Robinson

6th Middlesex

2/9/2021

Brendan P. Crighton

Third Essex

2/11/2021

Erika Uyterhoeven

27th Middlesex

2/11/2021

Rebecca L. Rausch

Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex

2/11/2021

Brandy Fluker Oakley

12th Suffolk

2/16/2021

Christine P. Barber

34th Middlesex

2/16/2021

Paul F. Tucker

7th Essex

2/16/2021

Kevin G. Honan

17th Suffolk

2/17/2021

Jason M. Lewis

Fifth Middlesex

2/22/2021

Edward R. Philips

8th Norfolk

2/22/2021

Kip A. Diggs

2nd Barnstable

2/22/2021

Sally P. Kerans

13th Essex

2/22/2021

Michael J. Moran

18th Suffolk

2/22/2021

Sarah K. Peake

4th Barnstable

2/23/2021

Michael J. Barrett

Third Middlesex

2/23/2021

James J. O'Day

14th Worcester

2/23/2021

John J. Mahoney

13th Worcester

2/23/2021

David M. Rogers

24th Middlesex

2/24/2021

Harriette L. Chandler

First Worcester

2/24/2021

Elizabeth A. Malia

11th Suffolk

2/24/2021

Michael P. Kushmerek

3rd Worcester

2/25/2021

Natalie M. Higgins

4th Worcester

2/25/2021

Marjorie C. Decker

25th Middlesex

2/25/2021

Kenneth I. Gordon

21st Middlesex

2/25/2021

William C. Galvin

6th Norfolk

2/25/2021

Carlos González

10th Hampden

2/26/2021

David Henry Argosky LeBoeuf

17th Worcester

2/26/2021

Tricia Farley-Bouvier

3rd Berkshire

2/26/2021

Lori A. Ehrlich

8th Essex

2/26/2021

Rady Mom

18th Middlesex

2/26/2021

James Arciero

2nd Middlesex

2/26/2021

Michelle M. DuBois

10th Plymouth

2/26/2021

Orlando Ramos

9th Hampden

2/26/2021

Andres X. Vargas

3rd Essex

2/26/2021

Daniel M. Donahue

16th Worcester

2/26/2021

Kate Lipper-Garabedian

32nd Middlesex

2/26/2021

Paul W. Mark

2nd Berkshire

2/26/2021

Daniel J. Hunt

13th Suffolk

2/26/2021

Daniel Cahill

10th Essex

2/26/2021

Joan Meschino

3rd Plymouth

2/27/2021

Nika C. Elugardo

15th Suffolk

2/27/2021

Alice Hanlon Peisch

14th Norfolk

3/1/2021

Marcos A. Devers

16th Essex

3/2/2021

Patricia D. Jehlen

Second Middlesex

3/2/2021

Mary S. Keefe

15th Worcester

3/3/2021

Daniel J. Ryan

2nd Suffolk

3/5/2021

Julian Cyr

Cape and Islands

3/16/2021

John H. Rogers

12th Norfolk

3/26/2021

Edward F. Coppinger

10th Suffolk

4/14/2021

Meghan Kilcoyne

12th Worcester

5/4/2021

William J. Driscoll, Jr.

7th Norfolk

7/7/2021

Bud L. Williams

11th Hampden

11/29/2021

Jacob R. Oliveira

7th Hampden

1/7/2022

Jamie Zahlaway Belsito

4th Essex

1/13/2022

Smitty Pignatelli

4th Berkshire

5/3/2022


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1165        FILED ON: 2/2/2021

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 2418

By Representatives Balser of Newton and Miranda of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2418) of Ruth B. Balser, Liz Miranda and others relative to local and state law enforcement involvement in federal immigration enforcement.  Public Safety and Homeland Security.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninety-Second General Court
(2021-2022)

_______________

 

An Act to protect the civil rights and safety of all Massachusetts residents.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Safe Communities Act”

SECTION 2. Chapter 147 of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting after section 62 the following section:-

Section 63. Updates to Law Enforcement Procedures

(a) Definitions

As used in this section, the following words shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

“Law enforcement agency”, any state, municipal, college or university police department, sheriff’s department, correctional facility, prosecutorial office, court, probation office, or program of one or more of the foregoing entities, or any other non-federal entity in the commonwealth charged with the enforcement of laws or the custody of detained persons.

“Immigration enforcement”, any and all efforts to investigate, enforce, or assist in investigating or enforcing any federal immigration law. Such purposes do not include verification of an applicant’s eligibility for state or federal programs or services.

“United States Department of Homeland Security” or “DHS”, the United States Department of Homeland Security and its component agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, Customs and Border Protection, and any other federal agency charged with enforcing immigration laws.

(b) Community relations with law enforcement agencies

Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, no officer or employee of a law enforcement agency, while acting under color of law, shall question persons, including victims and witnesses of crimes, about their immigration status unless state or federal law requires the inquiry, provided that judges and magistrates may make such inquiries as are necessary to adjudicate matters within their jurisdictions.

(c) Due process protections

Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, an interview, including any informal questioning, between an agent of the United States Department of Homeland Security or state or local law enforcement agent and a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency conducted for immigration enforcement purposes shall take place only if the person in custody gives informed consent by signing a written consent form provided by the law enforcement agency. The consent form shall explain that: (i) the interview is for immigration enforcement or deportation purposes; (ii) any information provided at the interview can be used against the person; (iii) the person may decline to sign any documents that are presented during the interview; and (iv) the person may choose to decline the interview or to be interviewed only with an attorney present, at the person’s own expense. The consent form shall provide a checkbox or other means to indicate if an interview has taken place, and if so, if an attorney was present. The consent form shall be available in English and other languages commonly spoken in Massachusetts. The law enforcement agency shall make best efforts to provide a consent form that is in a language that the person understands, and to provide oral interpretation if needed, in order to obtain the person’s informed consent for the interview. The office of the attorney general shall prepare the consent form and make it available to law enforcement agencies, and may work with interested not-for-profit organizations to prepare translations of the form.

Any and all records relating to the granting of these interviews or questioning shall be public records as defined in paragraph 26 of section 7 of chapter 4, provided that names, addresses, phone numbers and other personal identifying information shall not be a public record. These records include the signed consent forms obtained before the interviews, and information about whether the interview or questioning was conducted in the presence of an attorney.

(d) The preceding subsections (b) and (c) shall not apply to interviews or questioning of persons who are held in Massachusetts correctional facilities under an Inter-Governmental Service Agreement with the United States Department of Homeland Security, provided, however, that persons who are booked into a correctional facility under such an agreement shall be advised at the booking that the person (i) has the right to seek legal counsel from an immigration attorney at their own expense; (ii) may choose to decline to speak with a DHS agent or to speak with the DHS agent only with an attorney present; and (iii) may decline to sign any documents presented by a DHS agent.

(e) Guidelines for reporting release information

Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, no officer or employee of a law enforcement agency shall initiate communication with the United States Department of Homeland Security about the pending or imminent release, from state or local custody, of a person who is being released for any reason other than the end of a sentence of incarceration for a criminal conviction; provided, however, that nothing in this section shall prohibit or restrain any state or local agency from sending to, or receiving from, any local, state, or federal agency, information regarding citizenship or immigration status.

If a law enforcement agency receives a request for notification from the United States Department of Homeland Security regarding a person in its custody, including a request for notification under to federal form I-247A or I-247N, the law enforcement agency shall inform the person of the request and shall provide the person with a copy of the request and copies of any other documentation pertaining to the person’s case that is presented to the law enforcement agency by the United States Department of Homeland Security.

(f) Implementation and training

Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, all law enforcement agencies in the commonwealth shall, within 12 months of passage of this act, incorporate information and guidance regarding this section into their regular introductory and in-service training programs. An individual may file a complaint for a violation of this section with the corresponding department or agency, which shall investigate the complaint. At the conclusion of the investigation, the agency head shall provide the executive office of public safety and security with a written summary of the investigation’s findings. If the agency head substantiates the allegations, the written summary shall provide details of the specific actions taken to correct the violation as well as details of the sanctions imposed on the subjects of the investigation, if any. Findings made under this subsection shall be public records as defined in paragraph 26 of section 7 of chapter 4, provided that personal identifying information shall not be a public record.

SECTION 3. Chapter 126 of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting after section 39 the following section:-

Section 40. Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, no officer or employee of the department of corrections, the state police, any sheriff’s department, or any city or town police department shall perform the functions of an immigration officer, whether pursuant to 8 U.S.C. section 1357(g) or any other law, regulation, or policy, whether formal or informal. Any agreements in existence at the time of the passage of the law that are inconsistent with this section are null and void. Any entity of the commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof that is a party to such an agreement on the date of the passage of this act shall, within 90 days, inform the other party or parties that the contract is null and void under Massachusetts law. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the department of correction or a house of correction from entering into an Inter-Governmental Service Agreement with the United States Department of Homeland Security in which persons in Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody are housed at the house of correction and the United States Department of Homeland Security pays a daily fee for each person detained there.