HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2165 FILED ON: 2/16/2021
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 2690
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Daniel J. Hunt
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act relative to municipal police department employees.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: | Date Added: |
Daniel J. Hunt | 13th Suffolk | 2/16/2021 |
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2165 FILED ON: 2/16/2021
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 2690
By Mr. Hunt of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2690) of Daniel J. Hunt relative to line-of-duty related mental impairment of municipal police department employees. Public Service. |
[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 2297 OF 2019-2020.]
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninety-Second General Court
(2021-2022)
_______________
An Act relative to municipal police department employees.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Section 1: Chapter 41 of the General Laws, as so appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by adding the following new section:-
Section 34: Any employee of a municipal police department who, preceding the date of disablement, had not been previously diagnosed with a mental impairment, is diagnosed with a mental impairment then the mental impairment is presumptively an occupational disease and shall be presumed to have been due to the nature of the employment. This presumption may be rebutted by substantial factors brought by the employer or insurer. Any substantial factors that are used to rebut this presumption and that are known to the employer or insurer at the time of the denial of liability shall be communicated to the employee on the denial of liability. The mental impairment is not considered an occupational disease if it results from disciplinary action, work evaluation, job transfer, layoff, demotion, promotion, termination, retirement, or similar action taken in good faith by the employer.