HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1844        FILED ON: 1/18/2023

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1547

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Natalie M. Higgins and Tram T. Nguyen

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act to improve protections relative to domestic violence.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Natalie M. Higgins

4th Worcester

1/18/2023

Tram T. Nguyen

18th Essex

1/18/2023

Kathleen R. LaNatra

12th Plymouth

1/24/2023

Lindsay N. Sabadosa

1st Hampshire

1/24/2023

Mindy Domb

3rd Hampshire

1/24/2023

Susannah M. Whipps

2nd Franklin

1/24/2023

Jack Patrick Lewis

7th Middlesex

1/26/2023

James K. Hawkins

2nd Bristol

1/27/2023

Christine P. Barber

34th Middlesex

1/30/2023

Ruth B. Balser

12th Middlesex

2/3/2023

Carol A. Doherty

3rd Bristol

2/3/2023

Andres X. Vargas

3rd Essex

2/3/2023

Steven Owens

29th Middlesex

2/3/2023

Christopher M. Markey

9th Bristol

2/3/2023

Rebecca L. Rausch

Norfolk, Worcester and Middlesex

2/6/2023

Jason M. Lewis

Fifth Middlesex

2/7/2023

Walter F. Timilty

Norfolk, Plymouth and Bristol

2/8/2023

Tackey Chan

2nd Norfolk

2/9/2023

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex

2/9/2023

Patrick M. O'Connor

First Plymouth and Norfolk

2/9/2023

Frank A. Moran

17th Essex

2/10/2023

Kate Lipper-Garabedian

32nd Middlesex

2/23/2023

Margaret R. Scarsdale

1st Middlesex

3/6/2023

Steven George Xiarhos

5th Barnstable

3/10/2023

Kevin G. Honan

17th Suffolk

3/14/2023

Adrianne Pusateri Ramos

14th Essex

3/15/2023

Thomas M. Stanley

9th Middlesex

3/17/2023

Tommy Vitolo

15th Norfolk

3/20/2023

Natalie M. Blais

1st Franklin

3/27/2023

James C. Arena-DeRosa

8th Middlesex

4/11/2023

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

4/12/2023

Michelle L. Ciccolo

15th Middlesex

4/14/2023

Russell E. Holmes

6th Suffolk

4/26/2023

Danillo A. Sena

37th Middlesex

4/28/2023

Joan B. Lovely

Second Essex

5/3/2023

Kristin E. Kassner

2nd Essex

5/3/2023

Carole A. Fiola

6th Bristol

5/3/2023

Ryan C. Fattman

Worcester and Hampden

5/3/2023

John Barrett, III

1st Berkshire

5/4/2023

Samantha Montaño

15th Suffolk

5/4/2023

Patricia A. Duffy

5th Hampden

5/8/2023

Tricia Farley-Bouvier

2nd Berkshire

5/25/2023

Simon Cataldo

14th Middlesex

5/25/2023

William J. Driscoll, Jr.

7th Norfolk

6/7/2023

Aaron L. Saunders

7th Hampden

6/8/2023

Judith A. Garcia

11th Suffolk

6/21/2023

Ryan M. Hamilton

15th Essex

6/27/2023

Carmine Lawrence Gentile

13th Middlesex

6/30/2023

John J. Mahoney

13th Worcester

7/10/2023

Mathew J. Muratore

1st Plymouth

7/14/2023

Norman J. Orrall

12th Bristol

7/27/2023

Jacob R. Oliveira

Hampden, Hampshire and Worcester

7/27/2023

Kate Donaghue

19th Worcester

7/27/2023

Danielle W. Gregoire

4th Middlesex

7/27/2023

Mary S. Keefe

15th Worcester

8/30/2023

David T. Vieira

3rd Barnstable

9/7/2023


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1844        FILED ON: 1/18/2023

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1547

By Representatives Higgins of Leominster and Nguyen of Andover, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1547) of Natalie M. Higgins, Tram T. Nguyen and others relative to domestic violence protections.  The Judiciary.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninety-Third General Court
(2023-2024)

_______________

 

An Act to improve protections relative to domestic violence.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following words shall have the following meanings:

“Coercive control”, for purposes of this chapter, coercive control is a pattern of conduct that has the purpose or effect of substantially restricting an individual’s safety or autonomy through intimidation, isolation, implicit or explicit threats, or by compelling compliance. Conduct undertaken by an individual to protect themselves or their children from the risk of present or  future harm does not constitute coercive control. Examples of coercive control include:

(i) Isolating the other parent from friends, relatives, faith, cultural, or linguistic communities, employment, education, or other support networks;

(ii) Repeatedly humiliating or using degrading language or behaviors towards the petitioner;

(iii) Controlling, regulating, or monitoring the individual’s activities, communications, movements, finances, economic resources, or access to resources;

(iv) Threatening to harm, abduct or kill the individual or a child or relative of the individual;

(v) Threatening to publish information or make false reports to the police or the authorities;

(vi) Damaging property or household goods;

(vii) Forcing the individual to take part in criminal activity;

(viii)  Committing or threatening to commit cruelty or abuse to animals connected to the family;

(ix)  Using repeated court actions not warranted by existing law or good faith argument to harass, coerce, or control the other party, diminish or exhaust the other party’s financial resources, or compromise the other party’s employment or housing;

(x)  Cleaning, accessing, displaying, using, or wearing a firearm in an intimidating or threatening manner; and

(xi) Threatening deportation or to contact local or federal agencies based on actual or perceived immigration status, refusing to file immigration applications, refusing to sponsor, withholding essential documents needed for immigration applications, or threatening to withdraw immigration applications filed on the other parent’s or child’s behalf or coercing or forcing the other parent to violate the terms of their immigration visa.

“Technological abuse”, an act or pattern of behavior intended to harm, threaten, intimidate, control, stalk,  harass, impersonate, exploit, or extort,  such as cyberstalking or other forms of electronic monitoring or surveillance, nonconsensual sharing of explicit images, or impersonation. Technological abuse can utilize any form of technology, including but not limited to Internet, social networking sites, computers, mobile devices, cellular telephones, apps, location tracking devices, instant messages, text messages, and other forms of technology.

(b) Section 1 of Chapter 209A of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting the following after subsection (c) in the definition of “abuse”:-

(d) coercive control

(e) technological abuse.

SECTION 2. The fourth sentence of Section 63 of ch. 277 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2018 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the word “sections” the following words:- 13A, 13M