HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1222        FILED ON: 1/18/2023

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 936

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Ruth B. Balser and Tricia Farley-Bouvier

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act providing continuity of care for mental health treatment.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Ruth B. Balser

12th Middlesex

1/18/2023

Tricia Farley-Bouvier

2nd Berkshire

1/18/2023

John F. Keenan

Norfolk and Plymouth

1/18/2023

James C. Arena-DeRosa

8th Middlesex

1/25/2023

Lindsay N. Sabadosa

1st Hampshire

1/25/2023

Tram T. Nguyen

18th Essex

1/25/2023

Rodney M. Elliott

16th Middlesex

1/25/2023

Vanna Howard

17th Middlesex

2/2/2023

Mary S. Keefe

15th Worcester

2/7/2023

Carlos González

10th Hampden

3/29/2023

Christopher Richard Flanagan

1st Barnstable

6/28/2023

Rebecca L. Rausch

Norfolk, Worcester and Middlesex

7/11/2023

Ryan M. Hamilton

15th Essex

12/3/2023


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1222        FILED ON: 1/18/2023

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 936

By Representatives Balser of Newton and Farley-Bouvier of Pittsfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 936) of Ruth B. Balser, Tricia Farley-Bouvier and others relative to providing continuity of care for mental health treatment insurance coverage.  Financial Services.

 

[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 1039 OF 2021-2022.]

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninety-Third General Court
(2023-2024)

_______________

 

An Act providing continuity of care for mental health treatment.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Section 1 of chapter 176O of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting after the definition of “Concurrent review” the following definition:-

“Continuing course of treatment”, having at least 1 visit in the past 4 months for the same or similar mental health diagnosis or set of symptoms.

SECTION 2. Subsection (e) of section 15 of said chapter 176O is hereby amended by striking out the words “that could have been imposed if the provider had not been disenrolled;” and inserting in place thereof the following words:- permitted under this section;.

SECTION 3. The second sentence of said subsection (e) of said section 15 of said chapter 176O is hereby further amended by striking out the word “remained” and inserting in place thereof the following words:- had been.

SECTION 4. Section 15 of said chapter 176O is hereby further amended by adding after subsection (k) the following subsection:-

(l) A carrier shall allow any insured who is engaged in a continuing course of treatment with a licensed mental health provider eligible for coverage under the plan, and whose provider in connection with said mental health treatment is involuntarily or voluntarily disenrolled, other than for quality-related reasons or for fraud, or whose carrier has changed for any reason thereby placing the provider out-of-network, to continue treatment with said provider through an out-of-network option, pursuant to the following:

(1) The carrier shall reimburse the licensed mental health care professional the usual network per-unit reimbursement rate for the relevant service and provider type as payment in full. If more than one reimbursement rate exists, the carrier shall use the median reimbursement rate.

(2) The non-network option may require that a covered person pay a higher co-payment only if the higher co-payment results from increased costs caused by the use of a non-network provider. The carrier shall provide an actuarial demonstration of the increased costs to the division of health care finance and policy at the commissioner’s request. If the increased costs are not justified, the commissioner shall require the carrier to recalculate the appropriate costs allowed and resubmit the appropriate co-payment to the division of health care finance and policy.

(3) No additional charges, costs or deductibles may be levied due to the exercise of the out-of-network option. The amount of any additional co-payment charged by the carrier for the additional cost of the creation and maintenance of coverage described in subsection (1) shall be paid by the covered person unless it is paid by an employer or other person through agreement with the carrier.