SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1318        FILED ON: 1/19/2023

SENATE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 876

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Anne M. Gobi

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act to maintain stable housing for families with pets in an economic crisis and beyond.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

 

Anne M. Gobi

Worcester and Hampshire

 

Jack Patrick Lewis

7th Middlesex

1/30/2023

Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr.

12th Hampden

2/7/2023

James K. Hawkins

2nd Bristol

2/14/2023

Thomas M. Stanley

9th Middlesex

2/14/2023

Patrick M. O'Connor

First Plymouth and Norfolk

2/15/2023

Rebecca L. Rausch

Norfolk, Worcester and Middlesex

3/15/2023

Carol A. Doherty

3rd Bristol

3/21/2023

Mike Connolly

26th Middlesex

9/26/2023

Sal N. DiDomenico

Middlesex and Suffolk

9/26/2023

Paul W. Mark

Berkshire, Hampden, Franklin and Hampshire

9/26/2023

Mark C. Montigny

Second Bristol and Plymouth

9/26/2023

Pavel Payano

First Essex

9/26/2023


SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1318        FILED ON: 1/19/2023

SENATE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 876

By Ms. Gobi, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 876) of Anne M. Gobi, Jack Patrick Lewis, Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr., James K. Hawkins and other members of the General Court for legislation to maintain stable housing for families with pets in an economic crisis and beyond.  Housing.

 

[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE SENATE, NO. 885 OF 2021-2022.]

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninety-Third General Court
(2023-2024)

_______________

 

An Act to maintain stable housing for families with pets in an economic crisis and beyond.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Notwithstanding chapter 186 or 239 of the General Laws, as so appearing in the 2022 Official Edition, or any general or special law, rule, regulation or order to the contrary, no landlord shall initiate action to evict any person from a residential dwelling unit who has a pet without written permission based solely on the presence of the pet until one year after a state of emergency, unless the presence of pets is causing harm to the safety of other residents.

SECTION 2. No hotel, as defined in section 14 of chapter 140 shall unreasonably refuse to allow pets, unless the pet has caused a demonstrated noise or safety threat, during a state of emergency.

SECTION 3. Section 12 of Chapter 183A of the General Laws, as so appearing in the 2022 official edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the words “master deed”, in subsection (d), the following words:- However, no provision in the declaration, bylaws or rules and regulations of the organization of unit owners shall prohibit the keeping of certain types of dogs based on breed, size, weight or appearance.

SECTION 4. Section 3 of Chapter 23B of the General Laws, as so appearing in the 2022 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the second use of the word “elderly” under part “(u)” the following words:- , provided that no regulation, rule or policy shall prohibit the keeping of dogs based on the dog’s breed, size, weight or appearance.

SECTION 5. Section 3 of Chapter 23B is hereby further amended by inserting the following new subsection:-

(w) establish, conduct and maintain a program of pet ownership by residents of state-aided public housing, provided that no regulation, rule or policy shall prohibit the keeping of dogs based on the dog’s breed, size, weight or appearance.

SECTION 6. Chapter 175 of the General Laws is hereby amended by adding the following section:

Section 231. An insurance company offering homeowners insurance coverage or renters insurance coverage that issues a policy or contract insuring against liability for injury to a person or injury to or destruction of property arising out of the ownership or lease of residential property shall not refuse to issue, renew, cancel, or charge or impose an increased premium or rate of such a policy or contract based in whole or in part upon the harboring of a specific breed of the dog upon the property.

An insurance company may not ask or inquire about the breed or mixture of breeds of a dog that is harbored or owner on an applicable property except to ask if the dog is known to be dangerous or has been designated a dangerous dog pursuant to law.

Nothing in this section shall prohibit an insurer from refusing to issue or renew or from canceling a contract or policy or from imposing an increased premium or rate for a policy or contract if any dog being harbored on the property has been designated as a dangerous dog pursuant to law.

SECTION 7. Section 32 of Chapter 121B of the General Laws, as so appearing in the 2022 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting the following new paragraph after subsection (i):- In determining whether an applicant is eligible for tenancy in a property or if a current tenant can remain in a property, no property owned, managed or operated by an authority may make such a determination based on the breed, size, weight or appearance of a dog owned or cared for by the applicant or household member.