SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1644 FILED ON: 1/19/2023
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 954
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Sal N. DiDomenico
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act ensuring integrity in juvenile interrogations.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: |
|
Sal N. DiDomenico | Middlesex and Suffolk |
|
Adam Gomez | Hampden | 2/24/2023 |
Jason M. Lewis | Fifth Middlesex | 5/1/2023 |
Lydia Edwards | Third Suffolk | 5/1/2023 |
Patricia D. Jehlen | Second Middlesex | 9/22/2023 |
Pavel Payano | First Essex | 2/6/2024 |
SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1644 FILED ON: 1/19/2023
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 954
By Mr. DiDomenico, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 954) of Sal N. DiDomenico and Adam Gomez for legislation to ensure integrity in juvenile interrogations. The Judiciary. |
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninety-Third General Court
(2023-2024)
_______________
An Act ensuring integrity in juvenile interrogations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Chapter 119 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2020 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after section 89 the following section:
Section 90. Prohibition on use of deception during juvenile custodial interrogations
Section 90. (a) As used in this section, the following words shall have the following meanings:
i. “Statement” means a juvenile’s oral assertion, written assertion, or nonverbal conduct if intended as an assertion.
ii. “Juvenile” shall have the same meaning as set forth in G.L. ch. 119, section 89.
iii. “Deception” means communicating, or relaying in any way, false or misleading facts, false or misleading information, false or misleading evidence, or unauthorized implicit or explicit offers of leniency.
iv. “Custodial Interrogation” means any questioning by law enforcement officers, or persons acting on behalf of a law enforcement officers, in relation to an investigation, under circumstances where a reasonable juvenile would consider themselves to be in custody, and that questioning is likely to elicit an incriminating response.
(b)A statement made by a juvenile during a custodial interrogation shall be presumed to be involuntary, and therefore inadmissible in any court where such statement is offered as evidence, if during the custodial interrogation a law enforcement officer, or person acting on behalf of a law enforcement officer, knowingly engages in deception.
A statement that is involuntary, as described in the above paragraph, shall not form the basis of any further investigative activities; any evidence that flows from that statement shall be considered tainted by such deception, and shall be inadmissible as such.
(c)The presumption that such statement, as described in subsection (b), is inadmissible, may be overcome if the Commonwealth proves, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the statement was voluntary and not made due to any deception.
(d) Nothing in this section shall abrogate the Commonwealth’s burden to prove a statement is voluntary prior to introducing that statement into evidence.
(e)Subsection (b) shall apply to all statements, as described in subsection (b), made on or after the effective date of this statute.