HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1541        FILED ON: 1/15/2025

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1973

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Lindsay N. Sabadosa and Jack Patrick Lewis

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act protecting personal security.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Date Added:

Lindsay N. Sabadosa

1st Hampshire

1/15/2025

Jack Patrick Lewis

7th Middlesex

1/15/2025

Samantha Montaño

15th Suffolk

3/5/2025

Erika Uyterhoeven

27th Middlesex

4/2/2025

Steven Owens

29th Middlesex

5/5/2025

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

5/7/2025

Thomas M. Stanley

9th Middlesex

5/7/2025

Christine P. Barber

34th Middlesex

5/7/2025

Marjorie C. Decker

25th Middlesex

5/9/2025

Danillo A. Sena

37th Middlesex

5/12/2025

Natalie M. Higgins

4th Worcester

5/21/2025

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

6/30/2025

Mike Connolly

26th Middlesex

7/17/2025

Steven Ultrino

33rd Middlesex

7/28/2025

Carmine Lawrence Gentile

13th Middlesex

8/4/2025


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1541        FILED ON: 1/15/2025

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1973

By Representatives Sabadosa of Northampton and Lewis of Framingham, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1973) of Lindsay N. Sabadosa, Jack Patrick Lewis and Samantha Montaño relative to name changes.  The Judiciary.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninety-Fourth General Court
(2025-2026)

_______________

 

An Act protecting personal security.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

Chapter 210 of the General Laws is hereby amended by striking out section 13, as appearing in the 2022 Official Edition, and inserting in place thereof the following section:-

Section 13. (a) The court shall, before decreeing a change of name, request a report from the commissioner of probation on the person filing the petition and, upon entry of a decree, the name as established thereby shall be the legal name of the petitioner, and the register may issue a certificate, under the seal of the court, of the name as so established.

No decree shall be entered, however, until there has been filed in the court a copy of the birth record of the person whose name is sought to be changed and, in case such person's name has previously been changed by decree of court or at marriage pursuant to section 1D of chapter 46, either a copy of the record of such person’s birth amended to conform to the previous decree changing the person’s name, a copy of such decree or a copy of the record of marriage; provided, that the filing of any such copy may be dispensed with if the judge is satisfied that it cannot be obtained.

(b) The court shall, at the request of the person whose name is sought to be changed, order that the petition for name change, all pleadings, papers or documents filed in connection therewith, docket entries in the permanent docket and record books shall not be available for inspection if the court finds that an open record of the person's name change would jeopardize such person's safety based on the totality of the circumstances. Upon such a finding, the petitions, reports, pleadings, papers, documents and permanent docket and record books shall be segregated. A separate permanent docket book shall be provided for all such segregated entries. This section shall apply to the index of the court of all such segregated entries, a separate index of which shall be provided.

For the purposes of this section, "totality of the circumstances" shall include, but not be limited to, a consideration of the risk of violence or discrimination against the person, including the person’s gender non-conformity or status as transgender or as a survivor of domestic violence.

The court shall not deny such request to segregate solely on the basis that the person lacks specific instances of or a personal history of threats to their personal safety.