HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 3771 FILED ON: 1/17/2025
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 4217
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Alyson M. Sullivan-Almeida
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act to ensure fair due process in special education disputes.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: | Date Added: |
Alyson M. Sullivan-Almeida | 7th Plymouth | 1/17/2025 |
Michael O. Moore | Second Worcester | 9/8/2025 |
Peter J. Durant | Worcester and Hampshire | 9/8/2025 |
Lisa Field | 3rd Bristol | 10/8/2025 |
Ryan C. Fattman | Worcester and Hampden | 10/8/2025 |
Steven S. Howitt | 4th Bristol | 10/8/2025 |
Marc T. Lombardo | 22nd Middlesex | 10/8/2025 |
John J. Marsi | 6th Worcester | 10/8/2025 |
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 3771 FILED ON: 1/17/2025
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 4217
By Representative Sullivan-Almeida of Abington, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 4217) of Alyson M. Sullivan-Almeida relative to special education disputes. Education. |
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninety-Fourth General Court
(2025-2026)
_______________
An Act to ensure fair due process in special education disputes.
Whereas, The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purpose, which is to forthwith ensure fair due process in special education disputes, therefore it is hereby declared to be an emergency law, necessary for the immediate preservation of the public convenience.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 2A of chapter 71B of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2022 Official Edition, is hereby amended by adding the following subsection:-
(f) In all due process hearings conducted by the bureau of special education appeals under the: (i) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.; (ii) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794; or (ii) any general or special law or regulation governing general and special education rights and protections against discrimination and harassment, the school district shall have the burden of proof, including the burden of persuasion and production, of the proposed individualized education program, Section 504 plan or other educational decisions or actions by the bureau of special education appeals are appropriate, provide a free and appropriate public education and do not constitute discrimination or harassment. The burden of proof shall be met by a preponderance of the evidence. This provision shall aim to ensure that parents and families have equitable access to due process and that school districts are held accountable for their educational decisions.
SECTION 2. Section 3 of said chapter 71B, as so appearing, is hereby amended by inserting after the thirteenth paragraph the following paragraph:-
In all due process hearings conducted by the bureau of special education appeals under the: (i) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.; (ii) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794; or (iii) any general or special law or regulation governing general and special education rights and protections against discrimination and harassment, the school district shall have the burden of proof, including the burden of persuasion and production, of the proposed individualized education program, Section 504 plan or other educational decisions or actions by the bureau of special education appeals are appropriate, provide a free and appropriate public education and do not constitute discrimination or harassment. The burden of proof shall be met by a preponderance of the evidence. This provision shall aim to ensure that parents and families have equitable access to due process and that school districts are held accountable for their educational decisions.
SECTION 3. (a) There shall be established a special commission, pursuant to section 2A of chapter 4 of the General Laws, hereinafter referred to as the equitable access commission, to study and address barriers of equitable access for pro se litigants in due process hearings with the bureau of special education appeals established in section 2A of chapter 71B of the General Laws.
(b) The equitable access commission shall focus on identifying and recommending strategies to enable equitable access for the following groups: (i) parents, guardians and students that are 16 years of age or older who have a disability; (ii) individuals facing economic disadvantages; (iii) non-native English language speakers; (iv) families new to the United States' educational system; and (v) individuals encountering cultural barriers.
(c) The equitable access commission shall consist of the following members:
(i) chairs of the joint committee on education or their designees, who shall serve as co-chairs;
(ii) 1 member appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives;
(iii) 1 member appointed by the minority leader of the house of representatives;
(iv) 1 member appointed by the president of the senate;
(v) 1 member appointed by the minority leader of the senate;
(vi) 1 member appointed by the attorney general, who shall be a professional advocate or attorney that has no affiliation with the department of elementary and secondary education, including no history of serving in state appointments, state committees, state employment or receiving state funding that includes district employment or district contracting funding; and
(vii) 2 members appointed by the governor, 1 of whom shall be a parent or guardian of a student who has a disability and who is unaffiliated with the department of elementary and secondary education; and 1 of whom shall be a student who has a disability and is currently enrolled in or has recently exited the educational system in the commonwealth.
(d) The equitable access commission shall be responsible for: (i) conducting a comprehensive assessment of existing barriers to equitable access in the bureau of special education appeals due process hearings; (ii) gathering input from the aforementioned stakeholders to ensure that authentic experiences and perspectives are represented; (iii) developing recommendations for policy changes, resources and support systems that promote equitable access for all pro se litigants; and (iv) reporting its findings and recommendations to the general court within 1 year of its establishment pursuant to subsection (f).
(e) The equitable access commission shall convene its first meeting within 30 days of its establishment and shall operate in accordance with established guidelines to ensure transparency and inclusivity in its proceedings.
(f) The equitable access commission shall prepare a report detailing the results of the study, along with any recommendations and any proposed standards and legislation necessary to carry out its recommendations. The report shall be submitted to the: (i) joint committee on education; and (ii) clerks of the house of representatives and senate not later than 1 year of the establishment of the equitable access commission.