SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1964 FILED ON: 1/17/2025
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No.
|
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Edward J. Kennedy
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act restoring a lower threshold for permit challenges.
_______________
PETITION OF:
Name: | District/Address: |
Edward J. Kennedy | First Middlesex |
SENATE DOCKET, NO. 1964 FILED ON: 1/17/2025
SENATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No.
[Pin Slip] |
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninety-Fourth General Court
(2025-2026)
_______________
An Act restoring a lower threshold for permit challenges.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Chapter 40A of the General Laws, as amended by Chapter 150 of the Acts of 2024, is hereby further amended in Section 17 by striking out the third paragraph and inserting in place thereof the following paragraph:-
The court, in its discretion, may require a plaintiff in an action under this section appealing a decision to approve a special permit, variance or site plan to post a surety or cash bond in an amount of not more than $50,000 to secure the payment of costs if the court finds that the harm to the defendant or to the public interest resulting from delays caused by the appeal outweighs the financial burden of the surety or cash bond on the plaintiffs. The court shall consider the relative merits of the appeal and the relative financial means of the plaintiff and the defendant.