Skip to Content


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 991         FILED ON: 1/15/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1702

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Thomas J. Calter

_______________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
              Court assembled:

              The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act further defining comparable work.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Thomas J. Calter

12th Plymouth

Cory Atkins

14th Middlesex

Cheryl A. Coakley-Rivera

10th Hampden

Marjorie C. Decker

25th Middlesex

Stephen L. DiNatale

3rd Worcester

Lori A. Ehrlich

8th Essex

Colleen M. Garry

36th Middlesex

Denise Provost

27th Middlesex

Frank I. Smizik

15th Norfolk

Cleon H. Turner

1st Barnstable

Jason Lewis

 


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 991        FILED ON: 1/15/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1702

By Mr. Calter of Kingston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1702) of Thomas J. Calter and others for legislation to further define comparable worth in the workplace.  Labor and Workforce Development. 

 

[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE HOUSE, NO. 1415 OF 2011-2012.]


The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
 

_______________

In the Year Two Thousand Thirteen

_______________

 

An Act further defining comparable work.
 

              Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

              Section 105A of chapter 149 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2008 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the first sentence the following sentence:— 

              In any action brought under this section, the comparability of two positions shall be solely based on whether the two positions entail comparable skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions between employees of the opposite sex.

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The General Court provides this information as a public service and while we endeavor to keep the data accurate and current to the best of our ability, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Error