Skip to Content


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 3259         FILED ON: 1/18/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 756

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Stephen Kulik

_______________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
              Court assembled:

              The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act relative to the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Stephen Kulik

1st Franklin

William M. Straus

10th Bristol

William N. Brownsberger

Second Suffolk and Middlesex

Peter V. Kocot

1st Hampshire

Denise Andrews

2nd Franklin

Cory Atkins

14th Middlesex

Ruth B. Balser

12th Middlesex

Michael Barrett

Third Middlesex

Jennifer E. Benson

37th Middlesex

Garrett J. Bradley

3rd Plymouth

Katherine M. Clark

Fifth Middlesex

Thomas P. Conroy

13th Middlesex

Benjamin B. Downing

Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin and Hampden

Carolyn C. Dykema

8th Middlesex

Lori A. Ehrlich

8th Essex

James B. Eldridge

Middlesex and Worcester

Ann-Margaret Ferrante

5th Essex

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

Kenneth I. Gordon

21st Middlesex

Danielle W. Gregoire

4th Middlesex

Jonathan Hecht

29th Middlesex

Paul R. Heroux

2nd Bristol

Kate Hogan

3rd Middlesex

Louis L. Kafka

8th Norfolk

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex

Michael R. Knapik

Second Hampden and Hampshire

Jason Lewis

 

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

Brian R. Mannal

2nd Barnstable

Michael O. Moore

Second Worcester

William Smitty Pignatelli

4th Berkshire

Denise Provost

27th Middlesex

Michael J. Rodrigues

First Bristol and Plymouth

David M. Rogers

24th Middlesex

Tom Sannicandro

7th Middlesex

Ellen Story

3rd Hampshire

Cleon H. Turner

1st Barnstable

Sarah K. Peake

4th Barnstable


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 3259        FILED ON: 1/18/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 756

By Mr. Kulik of Worthington, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 756) of Stephen Kulik and others relative to the Endangered Species Act.  Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture. 


The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
 

_______________

In the Year Two Thousand Thirteen

_______________

 

An Act relative to the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act.
 

              Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

              SECTION 1. Section 1 of chapter 131A of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2010 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting, after the definition of “Plant,” the following new definition:-
“Priority habitat,” the geographic extent of habitat for an endangered or threatened species or species of special concern as delineated by the division of fisheries and wildlife based on the best scientific evidence available and as set forth in section 4 for the purpose of conducting a screening of a proposed project or activity to determine whether the project or activity will result in a take of said species.
SECTION 2. Section 4 of chapter 131A of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby amended by inserting before the last paragraph the following paragraphs:-
The division shall comply with the following public notice and comment requirements each time it reevaluates the priority habitat map:
(1)              Upon completion of its re-evaluation of the current priority habitat map, the division shall provide a public comment period of not less than 60 days on the proposed updated priority habitat map, including all areas to be newly added as priority habitat and all areas to be removed from priority habitat.
(2)              The division shall post its proposed updated priority habitat map, together with a summary explanation of the changes to the map, on the division’s website. The division’s website  shall include the capability to allow the public to determine whether an individual parcel of property is located within priority habitat.  The division also shall publish notice of the availability of the proposed updated priority habitat map and the public comment period on the division’s website, in the environmental monitor, in at least 1 newspaper with general circulation, and in other newspapers with regional or local circulation, as deemed appropriate by the division. The division shall further provide such notice to planning boards, building inspectors and conservation commissions in municipalities where existing or new priority habitats have been or are proposed to be delineated or revised.
(3)              In addition to the public notice and comment procedures in subsections (a) and (b), the division shall, to the extent reasonably practicable, send notice of the public comment period on the updated priority habitat map to the owner of any property proposed to be added as priority habitat. The division shall determine the owner of said property based on assessor records, provided, however, that the failure of the division to notify said property owner shall not affect the validity of the delineation of priority habitat on that property.
(4)              Following the close of the public comment period, the division shall evaluate the public comments received on its proposed updated priority habitat map, and shall post the final updated priority habitat map, together with a summary response to public comments and a summary explanation of the changes to the priority habitat map, on the division’s website.
(5)              The division shall make available the final updated priority habitat map to the public electronically as a geographic information system data layer, as well as provide the final town-based priority map to planning boards, building inspectors and conservation commissions in all municipalities where priority habitats have been delineated.
The division shall thereafter periodically re-evaluate its priority habitat map to determine whether the map should be updated, subject to the procedural requirements in the preceding paragraph. Priority habitat shall be used by the division for the purpose of conducting a screening of a proposed project or activity within priority habitat to determine whether the project or activity will result in the take of an endangered or threatened species or species of special concern. The division’s delineation of priority habitat shall be based on the best scientific evidence available and other criteria established in regulation that may include, but is not limited to, an examination of the number, location and age of individual records documenting the occurrence of a state-listed species, and a methodology that draws clear distinctions between the 3 different listing classifications of state-listed species based on the relative threat to each species classification.
Any future occurrence information submitted to the division of an endangered or threatened species or species of special concern associated with the delineation of new priority habitat added subsequent to December 31, 2013 that is found by a person on the property of another, not including property or interests in property owned by the commonwealth or its subdivisions or subject to the provisions of Article 97, shall be accompanied by a written statement made under the pains and penalties of perjury by the person who obtained the record which certifies that the entry onto the property of another for said purpose was with the permission of the property owner. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall modify or otherwise affect the authority of the division in section 4 of chapter 131 or any other state or local government agency, commission or entity under existing law.
The division is authorized to require on-site or off-site mitigation as a condition of its authorization of a take of an endangered or threatened species or species of special concern resulting from a project or activity in priority habitat, provided however, that the scope of mitigation that the division may require for projects or activities that will result in the take of a species of special concern in priority habitat shall be at a value of a 1 to 1 mitigation ratio.
The division shall post draft conservation and management permits on its website and accept public comment on said draft permits for a period of 14 calendar days. The division shall further provide electronic notification of the availability of said draft permits on its website to any person who requests such notification in writing to the division.
SECTION 3. Pursuant to section 4 of chapter 131A of the General Laws, the division of fisheries and wildlife shall complete a reevaluation of the 2008 priority habitat map on or before December 31, 2013.
SECTION 4.  The division shall annually, on or before January 31st, submit a report to the clerks of the senate and the house of representatives on the number and outcome of its review of projects or activities within priority habitat under chapter 131A in the preceding calendar year.

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The General Court provides this information as a public service and while we endeavor to keep the data accurate and current to the best of our ability, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Error