Skip to Content


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1124         FILED ON: 1/16/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1243

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Linda Campbell

_______________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
              Court assembled:

              The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act updating the law relating to posting a security for seized animals in cruelty cases.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Linda Campbell

15th Essex

Louis L. Kafka

8th Norfolk

Carlo Basile

1st Suffolk

William N. Brownsberger

Second Suffolk and Middlesex

Jason M. Lewis

31st Middlesex

Cleon H. Turner

1st Barnstable

Denise Provost

27th Middlesex

Eugene L. O'Flaherty

2nd Suffolk

William C. Galvin

6th Norfolk

Peter V. Kocot

1st Hampshire

Kathi-Anne Reinstein

16th Suffolk

Mark J. Cusack

5th Norfolk

Tom Sannicandro

7th Middlesex

Martin J. Walsh

13th Suffolk

David Paul Linsky

5th Middlesex

Lori A. Ehrlich

8th Essex

Kenneth I. Gordon

21st Middlesex

Brian R. Mannal

2nd Barnstable

Christine E. Canavan

10th Plymouth

Michael D. Brady

9th Plymouth

William Smitty Pignatelli

4th Berkshire

Katherine M. Clark

Fifth Middlesex

Kevin G. Honan

17th Suffolk

Cheryl A. Coakley-Rivera

10th Hampden

Jonathan Hecht

29th Middlesex

Carl M. Sciortino, Jr.

34th Middlesex

Denise Andrews

2nd Franklin

James M. Murphy

4th Norfolk

Timothy R. Madden

Barnstable, Dukes and Nantucket

Thomas J. Calter

12th Plymouth

John P. Fresolo

16th Worcester

James J. Dwyer

30th Middlesex

James M. Cantwell

4th Plymouth

John J. Lawn, Jr.

10th Middlesex

Paul R. Heroux

2nd Bristol

Bruce E. Tarr

First Essex and Middlesex

John W. Scibak

2nd Hampshire

Sean Garballey

23rd Middlesex

Patricia D. Jehlen

Second Middlesex

Byron Rushing

9th Suffolk

Brian M. Ashe

2nd Hampden

Kay Khan

11th Middlesex


HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1124        FILED ON: 1/16/2013

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 1243

By Ms. Campbell of Methuen, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1243) of Linda Campbell and others relative to the posting of security for seized animals in cruelty cases.  The Judiciary. 


The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
 

_______________

In the Year Two Thousand Thirteen

_______________

 

An Act updating the law relating to posting a security for seized animals in cruelty cases.
 

              Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

              Chapter 272 of the General Laws is hereby replacing section 104 with the following section:-

              Section 104. (a) As used in this section the word "Authority" shall mean an organization or authorized agent thereof that seizes or impounds an animal pursuant to the General Laws.

              (b) If an animal is lawfully seized or impounded pursuant to the General Laws relating to cruelty to animals or animal fighting resulting in the issuance of a criminal complaint or a criminal indictment, the authority or prosecuting agency, including the district attorney or attorney general, may file a petition with the court that is exercising jurisdiction over the criminal complaint or criminal indictment requesting that the person from whom an animal is seized or a person claiming an interest in the seized animal, be ordered to post a security. The authority shall serve a copy of the petition on the person from whom the animal was seized, or if the person cannot be found, by posting of copy at the place where the animal was taken into custody. The authority shall also serve a copy of the petition on the district attorney or the attorney general, whichever is appropriate. The court may order that person to post a security.

              (c) The security shall be in an amount sufficient to secure payment for all reasonable expenses incurred, and to be incurred, by the authority having custody of the seized animal from the date of seizure or impoundment and thereafter for a period of at least 30 days. The amount of the security shall be determined by the court upon the recommendation of the authority. Reasonable expenses shall include, but shall not be limited to, estimated medical care, shelter, and board.

              (d) When security is posted in accordance with this section, the authority may draw from the security the actual reasonable costs incurred for medical care, shelter, and board. If the expenses already incurred by the seizing authority at the time of judicial decision on the petition exceed the petitioned for security amount, the court may permit the security amount to be paid in its entirety to the seizing authority through the court, or directly from the respondent to the authority, as the court deems appropriate in the interest of justice.

              (e) If the court orders the posting of security, the security shall be posted with the clerk within 10 business days of the court’s decision on the petition. The respondent’s failure to post security as determined within the appointed time shall be deemed an immediate forfeiture of the seized animal to the authority, with the full force and effect of a court order. The court may waive the security requirement or reduce the amount of the security for good cause shown.

              (f) Posting of the security shall not prevent the authority from disposing of the seized or impounded animal for humane reasons and in a humane manner before the expiration of the period covered by the security.

              (g) The authority may humanely dispose of the animal at the end of the period for which expenses are covered by the security, if the court orders the disposition. If the disposition order is denied, the court may require the owner or custodian or any other person claiming interest in the animal, to provide additional security to secure payment of reasonable expenses and to extend the period of time pending adjudication by the court of the charges against the person from whom the animal was seized.

              (h) The owner or custodian of an animal humanely euthanized pursuant to this section shall not be entitled to recover damages or the actual value of the animal if the owner or custodian failed to post security.

              (i) The court may direct a refund to the person who posted the security in whole or part for any expenses not incurred by the authority. The court shall direct a refund to the person who posted security upon acquittal of the charges.

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The General Court provides this information as a public service and while we endeavor to keep the data accurate and current to the best of our ability, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Error