Skip to Content
November 21, 2024 Rain | 46°F
The 193rd General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Bill S.1972 189th (2015 - 2016)

An Act relative to the spinal cord injury trust fund

The committee on Health Care Financing to whom was referred the petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 627) of Marc R. Pacheco, Patricia A. Haddad, Carolyn C. Dykema, Keiko M. Orrall and other members of the General Court for legislation relative to the spinal cord injury trust fund,- reports the accompanying bill (Senate, No. 1972).

Bill Information

Sponsor:
Joint Committee on Health Care Financing

Bill History

Displaying 13 actions for Bill S.1972
Date Branch Action
7/20/2015 Senate Reported from the committee on Health Care Financing
7/20/2015 Senate New draft of S627
7/20/2015 Senate Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Rules
9/17/2015 Senate Committee reported that the matter be placed in the Orders of the Day
9/17/2015 Senate Order relative to subject matter adopted
9/24/2015 Senate Amendment #1 (Pacheco) pending; pending amendment divided and part 1 adopted - Roll Call #166 [YEAS 39 - NAYS 0]
9/24/2015 Senate Read second
9/24/2015 Senate Part 3 of divided amendment (Pacheco) adopted - Roll Call #167 [YEAS 29 - NAYS 9]
9/24/2015 Senate Part 2 of divided amendment (Pacheco) adopted
9/24/2015 Senate Reprinted as amended, see S2019
9/24/2015 Senate Ordered to a third reading
9/24/2015 Senate Read third
9/24/2015 Senate Passed to be engrossed - see Roll Call #168 (YEAS 34 - NAYS 4)

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The General Court provides this information as a public service and while we endeavor to keep the data accurate and current to the best of our ability, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.